I think EN will be a free man!
Please. I don't think he is going anywhere. Conflicting stories or not.
I think EN will be a free man!
Is this correct that no one called LE until after TM was shot?
Why? EN came to their house and shot Tammy.
I didn't say the DA needed a motive. Juries like motives and their opinion is what matters.DA doesn't even have to have a motive. It's always good to have, but not necessary. In this case, suspect is apparently a stoner, so who is to say he was behaving anywhere near rationally?
Which grandparents live in the Mt Shasta home? Seems like I remember reading one grandfather quoted at the vigil.
I saw a photo on Bob's FB of a pretty Tammy & her daughter at the store. It didn't seem like the store belonged only to the sons. Family must be very close knit, IMO.
Didnt a grandfather say Brandon used a Glock?
To bring over the link (I'm on an iPhone), click "share" and select "Email"
If I'm quoting another WSer, I need to remember the OP, because that doesn't copy over, for some reason.
Once I'm in the new email window, I copy everything and cut it so I can paste it into a new post here on thread #2
Tapatalk will paste the post link at the top. You may have to move things around a bit in your new post for it to make sense (I usually put the link to the thread #1 post at the bottom but that's just a style thing).
Sorry for the O/T
HopeThisHelps
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It was a friend who put that up
Didnt a grandfather say Brandon used a Glock?
That's a vendor tent with watches and jewelry, not the pipe store. Brandon's facebook page says he is a manager of a tattoo/medical shop. I don't think he owns it like was initially stated here.I saw a photo on Bob's FB of a pretty Tammy & her daughter at the store. It didn't seem like the store belonged only to the sons. Family must be very close knit, IMO.
He'd use the truck to pull that vendor trailer in the driveway. If the truck was a home during the shooting (according to his statements), what was he doing out of town?
Thanks for this. On another (although related to this message) OT: how do you quote multiple posts? Thanks!
There were at least two people involved. The one arrested (small, brown hair and eyes) and the driver.Very interested in the family's explanation of the sketch and description being so drastically different from someone they knew. They claimed to see the shooter so close that they could say his eye color even at night. They've had such diarrhea of the mouth, curious why they haven't explained that. It's one of the pieces that frustrate me the most
There were at least two people involved. The one arrested (small, brown hair and eyes) and the driver.
I am still not clear which one got out of the car to threaten Mrs. Meyers and her daughter (if anybody did at all).
There are conflicting reports on that. Maybe the one described (large guy with blue or hazel eyes) is the driver?
I've watched that clip a few times. Makes me wonder if he just wanted to be on tv...was certainly excited enough at the attention. May not have been involved at all.
The family and LE have said that the sketch is of the shooter/driver.
The family amd LE says that EN is the shooter. So, if they knew the shooter and they supposedly saw the shooter that close...there is no explanation for the discrepancy.
(I just posted an article I was currently re-reading, but there are many that say the same things."
"Las Vegas Metro police have released surveillance video and a composite sketch of a man they say fired a gun multiple times after a road rage incident."
"Police said the man was driving a four-door grey or silver sedan that may have damage to the front driver's side. The vehicle might also have impact rounds from gunfire."
http://www.kpho.com/story/28112391/police-release-sketch-in-road-rage-shooting