Giuc0 ,
Your theory is unique, and well organized. I understand that SA was (and is a disaster). I would suppose it's completely plausible that an execution could happen in the states.
However, there are hundreds of other cases where bodies are dumped, riddled with bullets, sans id, and even with European dental work..... they usually turn out to be the result of a bad relationship, revenge, drugs....
Bullets, yes.
Bullet
in her mouth, not so much.
The bullets themselves are not enough for thinking about the apatheid theory.
The bullets shot in face are typical of the regime.
Another thing that makes this implausible, to me at least. Is that she would have family looking for her.... who would, through the police, be able to determine if she traveled to the US. It would be a matter of time until she was identified.
Not so fast !
People missing because of apartheid are searched by their love one. However,
1) assuming a false ID for fleeing the regime, if so
2) people in organizations used a code name. Code name the love ones didn't know, and couldn't know.
People missing from apartheid are searched by their families, but with so few clues & all the cover-up, they don't find them.
US was not immune to this phenomena in apartheid activism.
I'm equally sure that the police have access to foreigners that checked in with passports or visas, and didnt check out. I'm sure, this unidentified woman, has been checked against this list
The Doe Network file says it was, and it didn't pan out.
However, keep in mind that record keeping, in those days, was not as precise and as complete as it is nowadays.
The lack of fingerprints, in a database suggest she wasn't a criminal, or employed by any governments.
It's a very US-centric reasoning.
In France, for example, people who were involuntarily committed were taken fingerprints
without being arrested for a crime, let alone charged ! It was not entered in a national database, let alone international !
Fingerprint database were handwritten and paper stored. LE could only compare with a local database. You didn't have THE national and European database.
If you needed international checks, you only had Interpol. It was much smaller than it is now, thanks to the computering infancy. It didn't, and still doesn't, store people involuntarily institutionnalized, or people without a search warrant.
Also, in 1983, you had quite basic computers, and telex if you were lucky. Most of the time, you used typewriters and paper files.
DNA was not widely available.
Yes, LE may have ran their computer databases and asked Interpol over the time with the advance of technology.
However, we can't reason about record keeping in 1983 as if we would reason about an UID of, let say, two-three years ago.
The least surprising elements of her backstory (if she is identified) would be.
Broken family.
Parents dead, or unconcerned.
She probably had a broken marriage/relationship of her own.
Disassociated from her own children.
Picked up with some low life.
An argument occurred.
She was killed.
Married, to a serviceman (Canadian or US)
*it would not surprise me if there were another body, dumped somewhere else, in the general area, at that general time that is connected to this person.
I wish !!
However, nothing on the autopsy suggested any history of taking drugs. Even if we can't find what specific drugs, drug use leaves signs on the autopsy.
If she did pick up some low life, we would had stronger clues pointing to this.
The way she was dressed, her dental work doesn't suggest she was living a transient lifestyle.
A military, ok. But such an overkill for a husband ! Please !
These leads had been checked by LE, to no avail. When the usual leads don't pan out, we must change our method.
Her purse and identification, is probably in the bottom of a river, or lake within 5 hours of her final resting spot, or burned, or carefully discarded somewhere else.
It doesn't preclude the killing by the regime.
Au contraire !
She, very well could be Canadian, or a dual citizen. Probably spent time on both sides of the border.
not enough clues for one way or another.
I'm thinking that the fact She was dumped on a busy road, for anyone to easily spot.... suggests she wasn't closely connected to the killer.
Killers linked to the regime did dump their bodies in similar ways.
Said another way.... Someone who knew they would be questioned about her whereabouts, probably would have simply driven off an exit, to a more secluded spot, where it would take, days, weeks or years to discover her remains - not hours.
The problem is that : not so much in killings linked by dictature.
