Oh yea, that should be added! In 1982 he was 23. He said in 1990 that he learned from his prior abductions. So we know he was doing this before 1990.Here is another very high profile case from NW Ohio. jdw would have been fairly young at that time, but is it possible he could have done it?
http://www.toledoblade.com/local/2008/01/04/DNA-test-doesn-t-tie-Spirko-to-crime-scene.html
http://www.toledoblade.com/local/20...pirko-life-term-for-1982-Van-Wert-murder.html
I have to say the map is excellent! Detailed with each victim's story. You rock!!I'm just gonna put this here
James D Worley - Known & Potential Victim Case Map
This one? https://www2.fbi.gov/wanted/seekinfo/janedoeindiana.htm
No I haven't seen this one before, must have missed it. I have put the baby on now
I have a question that I hope someone who has been doing this longer than I can answer.
On the possible victims, we have include everyone in a radius. That makes sense. But couldn't we narrow the list down by not including those who weren't sexually assaulted? IMHO that seems to be his objective - not just killing people to kill them. He wants the sexual gratification.
Or is it normal to include all possible victims regardless if they were assaulted or not? (I know he didn't assault his first victim, but considering that LE found evidence of other assaults, I am thinking its safe to assume he has assaulted others).
Just curious how this normally works.
*wants to work on map, but has chores to do first*
lame! I'll get on it asap
Ha!
*wants to work on list, but is actually at WORK, and should probably work on that*
(pouts)
Elaine - thank you for answering my question so well. I hadn't thought of LE not releasing all the info or the evidence being to degraded!
There just seems to be so many potential victims. SO many unanswered cases.
Can I just say, you all rock! And I'm in awe of your sleuthing skills, and advocacy.