Trudie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
- Messages
- 11,496
- Reaction score
- 66,795
BBM
That is quite a stretch from what we information we have.
Not sure what you mean? Please?
BBM
That is quite a stretch from what we information we have.
T. They were monitoring phones and computers since 2014?
Does that infer that Jake was possibly a very jealous partner and wanted to know every person she was speaking to and what was said? That’s a significant control issue in my thinking. And when they broke up it may have driven him nuts. If he was as close to his grandmother as it is said, it may lead her into this much sooner and to a much more significant degree than has been proven.
Video monitoring equipment could have been anything from a teddy bear for her room, a clock or radio to a trail cam mounted on a tree across the road from her trailer.
I wonder that although the equipment had been destroyed if Jake had that info/recordings/video stored on a cd or hard drive LE found. I’m not certain but the phone provider may have had access to everything he downloaded on his phone or saved on it.
I didn’t realize the surveillance started two years prior to the murders. He could have listened to every intimate thing she did in her bedroom with anyone. And I’m assuming Angela would be familiar with surveillance from the Air Force and Fred would have each animal and barn covered in case of another incident or fire. Sheds new light in things from my perspective.
BBM
If they were close and on good terms in 2014, she may have given him passwords to her accounts. She may have used his phone or other device and had her password saved on them for easier access. LE can't ask her. Yes, he could monitor her SM and e-mail activities then and after the break up if she didn't change them. We just don't know what LE is referring to on this....
I helped do some research on that red truck way back when.
The truck was put in JM's name about 3 months before he got it
on the road. It sat in his yard til then. We guessed 1) it needed
work to be road worthy or 2) he didn't have money for insurance.
It had been previously titled to a guy in Peebles, who's name I did not recognize.
Was not a Wagner.
BBMSeems like all the young couples I know it’s normal for them to share passwords, check their SOs phone to be sure there’s no cheating, etc. IMO, it’s part of the immaturity going on in an immature puppy-love relationship. In my entire 32 marriage, I never answered my husbands phone or looked thru his contacts. But, we weren’t 15 & 20. Just sayin’.
Not sure what you mean? Please?
JW watching HMR having sex with other guys. We don't even know if there was a camera IN the house.
Wagner, his brother and parents are accused of meticulously planning the murders by hacking into social media accounts and monitoring them. They’re also accused of intercepting communications beginning as early as 2014. According to the indictment, Jake Wagner purchased a video recording device in March 2016 -- a month before the murders, but it and other evidence were destroyed.
Jake Wagner set to appear in court for Rhoden family massacre
Is it possible the video recording device referenced enabled the W’s to know exactly what time they could enter DRs home & exactly how many were there, etc? Was one (or more) watching in ‘real time’, from a phone, perhaps? We heard they used walkie talkie type devices for their AK road trips. Did they use walkie talkies at the murder scene?
Did the W’s use the aforementioned video recording device to know the layouts of each trailer home? Also, using said device to be able monitor where each occupant was at the specific moment of entry? Even tho one/more reportedly had familiarity with each home, it’d still be wise to know what the heck was going on at the moment of entry, especially with multiple persons in a home.
IMO, video recording device = voyeurism.
BBM
I can't say the same. When I was last married there was one push button phone, land lines, and contacts were written in a book or index.
T. They were monitoring phones and computers since 2014?
Does that infer that Jake was possibly a very jealous partner and wanted to know every person she was speaking to and what was said? That’s a significant control issue in my thinking. And when they broke up it may have driven him nuts. If he was as close to his grandmother as it is said, it may lead her into this much sooner and to a much more significant degree than has been proven.
Video monitoring equipment could have been anything from a teddy bear for her room, a clock or radio to a trail cam mounted on a tree across the road from her trailer.
I wonder that although the equipment had been destroyed if Jake had that info/recordings/video stored on a cd or hard drive LE found. I’m not certain but the phone provider may have had access to everything he downloaded on his phone or saved on it.
I didn’t realize the surveillance started two years prior to the murders. He could have listened to every intimate thing she did in her bedroom with anyone. And I’m assuming Angela would be familiar with surveillance from the Air Force and Fred would have each animal and barn covered in case of another incident or fire. Sheds new light in things from my perspective.
"This entire thing began and ended with Jake. It was his ex girlfriend, his ex in-laws, his child. Everything centered on Jake. If it did not center on Jake alone why didn't they kill George's ex wife and family?"
I believe they were able to get the other child away from his mother much easier. I believe they set her up and it worked.
YES, that.You are probably correct but something was different with that interview on 5/3 compared to the others for it to be wrote that way. Jmo
"This entire thing began and ended with Jake. It was his ex girlfriend, his ex in-laws, his child. Everything centered on Jake. If it did not center on Jake alone why didn't they kill George's ex wife and family?"
I believe they were able to get the other child away from his mother much easier. I believe they set her up and it worked.
Maybe a dif’ LE or agency? Idk, just a guess.
If AW/JW interviewed together, I envision this:
LE: was it hot yesterday?
AW: omg, yes, sweltering horrible heat & humidity.
JW: Yea, just like my mom said
LE: What time did you eat dinner yesterday?
AW: around 7
JW: Whatever time my mom said
LE: What time did you get up today?
AW: Around 8
JW: If mom says 8 that’s what I’m going with
So, there’d be no point in a joint sit down. IMO, they’d have to be in separate rooms with each interviewer asking the exact question of each person. Then, compare results. Just like jailing multiple suspects prior to trial. Keep them separated. Even in patrol cars. Separate them. LE wants no collusion. Now, it’s not always possible to have separate cars to haul them in as some LE cars are not adequately equipped to transport perps, but they’d be recorded.
As they say, it’s easier to remember the truth than a lie.
****wanted to add, JW had the same smirk at his arraignment we noticed him having during his pretrial. I think (due to his naïveté & possible immaturity) he enjoys the attention he’s getting. Jmo
IF the 4 are in fact guilty, it’s hard to guess how many times they were sneaking onto the R property (prior to the crimes) in the dark of the night, setting up devices.
IMO, tech’ has progressed far beyond what AW might have been familiar with during her AF stint.
I do agree there’s a digital footprint on someone’s laptop or phone.