A distant relative?it wasn't a member of the Rhoden family who was followed home from the post office. That's all I can say
A distant relative?it wasn't a member of the Rhoden family who was followed home from the post office. That's all I can say
Excellent work!
Give us every single detail.
How many Roosters?
A distant relative?
That scenario is very feasible. I too have been fleshing out an alternative order in which everyone was murdered. Mine is along these lines.That bothers me too. What if we are going about this in the wrong direction, meaning that whoever killed them did not know them all that well.
Maybe the normal course of events was CR1 slept in the house with DR and that is all the killer knew. If she and CR1 were reconciled that leads one to think that usually they were both sleeping in DR's house. If indeed she was up posting on facebook at 2:50 AM, didn't she wonder where her reconciled husband was? I know I would be getting some answers from someone if hubby was gone at 2:50AM in the morning. So that leads one to believe he was staying at the other trailer that night and she knew he was and why he was. Maybe he and DR did know the danger they or he was in and he decided to stay at the other place to keep DR and the kids separate from him and thereby keep them safe. Her facebook post on the 18th asking BH to pray for her family would lead us to believe she did know there was danger coming from somewhere. If they did know and knew the target was CR1 it makes sense he would stay somewhere else away from his kids.
What if DR was killed first, that the killer went to her house first looking for CR1 and found she was awake? Would she have been killed if she had been asleep and unaware anyone entered her home?
When they did not find him there they went to the other trailer, where they found him awake. After they killed him and GR they proceeded from there to FR and then KR.
Does any of this make sense to anyone?
Several roosters still there.
A couple of things I noticed-
Dana's house had neighbors on both sides, fairly close.
Chris and Frankie also had neighbors- 2 trailers close on one side.
The road is very secluded, lots of woods, and rough. Dana's trailer was off the road a little ways but Frankie's and Chris's were both very close to the road, as were the buildings.
The only building that wasn't boarded up was the biggest one- both ends were opened.
Several of the houses on the road had "no trespassing" and "no media" signs posted.
The roosters were still there in the same coops.
\maybe it didn't. Maybe I'm wrong.... So if your theory is that they did not know she got off at that time than you are calling it a coincidence.
so I guess it was a coincidence that the children were left unharmed?
i guess it was a coincidence that they knew where all four locations were.
i guess it is a coincidence that they knew where the cameras were or that they even existed.
I guess it is coincidence that they somehow entered all of the homes without being noticed or heard by any of the 8 victims.
i guess it is coincidence that they bypassed the dogs somehow .
I could go on... Just an awful lot of " coincidence " for a theory that supports it was not someone local and or personal with the victims.
Regarding the roosters
If at least one member of the Rhoden family sold roosters (saw pics on FB of several being sold for 75.00 each which included a hen) then I believe they were being raised to sell maybe for cockfighting not cockfighting at the Rhoden locations.
Jmo of the roosters
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They said in an article that I read that the properties had been turned over to the family and someone was taking care of them.I sure hope there is someone looking after the welfare of the roosters and dogs.
They were not trail cams. I am pretty certain that it was a CCTV setup. I'd have to find the link. But that's totally different. CCTV is like what most of these little Stop & Go gas station stores have.
$75 is a far cry from the $1,000 figure I have seen thrown around.
OK--helps a little. So--are the cameras feeding to a computer? IOW, could the intruders have just taken the computer with them, and with it all record of what the cameras saw? If so, that's totally different (much easier) than actually knocking out the cameras themselves.
it wasn't a member of the Rhoden family who was followed home from the post office. That's all I can say
I sure hope there is someone looking after the welfare of the roosters and dogs.
See post #917...
Will also edit in some links here. Just examples, outdoor cameras are waterproof....
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Wireless-Pa...584374?hash=item3f55a17576:g:6noAAOSwo0JWHFX6
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2TB-HDD-NVR...547517?hash=item5d5eecfabd:g:YVcAAOSwB4NWzrYl