Links for the CD & CE case files at the Ohio Supreme Court web site. They're in the Media & Timeline thread.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...mily-Members-Murdered&p=13234748#post13234748
Here's a link to the posts of summaries that some of us did on the court documents that were filed in the Ohio Supreme Court re the Columbus Dispatch (CD) and Cincinnati Enquirer (CE) lawsuits:
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...hunt-for-killer(s)-25&p=13232064#post13232064
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...hunt-for-killer(s)-25&p=13262819#post13262819
Notes and link to deposition of Michael Trout, Special Agent BCI
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...hunt-for-killer(s)-25&p=13232139#post13232139
Beginning on Page 34 of the deposition document (around page 12 of the PDF) of Pike County Coroner's deposition with the CD attorney, he states the decision to redact the autopsy reports and the redaction itself was done by either AG's office or BCI
http://supremecourt.ohio.gov/pdf_viewer/pdf_viewer.aspx?pdf=816546.pdf
CD attorney: You mentioned earlier representatives from the sheriff's office. Do you know whether representatives from the sheriff's office were involved - that is, you personally observed them or personally heard them making any suggestions or take any actions with respect to the redactions found in the reports?
AG Dewine/Coroner's Attorney: Objection
Coroner Kessler: My understanding is the people involved in the investigation were involved in the process but the specifics I don't know
CD Attorney: That is, the individuals who were involved in the investigation did not communicate to you that they were involved in making the redactions, did they?
AG DeWine/Coroner Attorney: Objection
Coroner Kessler: No
CD attorney: And of course legal counsel, you did not speak to anyone else regarding the redactions made to the final autopsy reports, those were decisions made by counsel as opposed to you, is that correct?
AG DeWine/Coroner Attorney: Object. Instruct you not to answer.
CD attorney: Well, sir, did you make the redactions in the final autopsy-final autopsy reports or were they made by legal counsel?
AG DeWine/Coroner attorney: Objection
Coroner Kessler:
I reviewed and approved the redactions.
CD Attorney: The redactions that you reviewed, were they - excuse me.
When you conducted that review, was it after there were already redactions made to the autopsy reports?
AG DeWine/Coroner Atty: Objection, I instruct you not to answer.
CD Atty: Well how does that involve a privileged communication?
AGDeWine/Coroner Atty: As Dr. Kessler has specified, the redactions were made in consultation with legal counsel, and to the extent we get any further into this, we're invading attorney/client privilege and I will continue to instruct him not to answer.
CD Atty: I'm not sure that's what the witness has said.
CD Atty to Coroner Kessler: Sir, as I understand it, at some point in time you were presented with a set of final autopsy reports that had redactions, is that correct?
AG DeWine/Coroner Atty: Objection and instruct---
Coroner Kessler: Yes
CD Atty: And once you received -- and you received that set of final autopsy reports containing redaction from legal counsel, is that correct?
AG DeWine/Coroner Atty: Objection. Instruction not to answer.
CD Atty: Did you receive a set of the final autopsy reports in a redacted form from any source other than legal counsel?
Coroner Kessler: No
CD Atty: And once you received the final autopsy reports in redacted format, did you make any changes to those redactions?
AG DeWine/Coroner's attorney makes a long string of objections here, trying to prevent Coroner Kessler from testifying that he received the redacted autopsy reports from investigators and that he didn't make changes.
CD Atty to Coroner Kessler: The question I'm asking you is that when you received them in that format, was that delivered to you by hand delivery?
AG DeWine/Coroner Atty: Objection. Form.
Coroner Kessler: I don't recall getting it hand delivered.
CD Atty: Do you recall electronically, such as an email?
AG DeWine/Coronoer Atty: Objection. Form.
Coroner Kessler: I think that's how I got it.
CD Atty: And you received it electronically from legal counsel?
Coroner Kessler: Yes
It goes on like this for a while. In a later question from the CD attorney,
Coroner Kessler acknowledges that no law enforcement official, at any time, communicated to him that any information included in the final autopsy reports would, if disclosed, reveal to the public any confidential investigatory information. If, as LE claims, the information in the AR's would compromise the investigation, why didn't they say that to the Coroner?
Kessler goes on to testify that it was the Hamilton County Coroner's office who compiled and wrote the original final autopsy reports (they were the ones who did the autopsies). He also states he doesn't know if the Hamilton County Coroner consulted with LE investigators.
There's more at the link to Coroner Kessler's deposition. I won't go into pages transcribing it, but it shows that LE, Rob Junk's office, DeWine's office and BCI are the ones who managed the redaction process and, inexplicably, fought very hard to keep the news media and the public from learning they did. Why?