lonesomepaws
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
- Messages
- 229
- Reaction score
- 3
Off topic a bit, but did they really name their son after a gun?
yes. And I hate to say its typical for the area but it wouldn't raise eyebrows there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Off topic a bit, but did they really name their son after a gun?
There are better ways to do that if the case. This makes him look untrustworthy.I don't know why he would contradict what Reader said earlier. It only makes them look stupid- like they have no idea who did the crime. I really hope this is a facade that'll help them out with the case in the end, but with the AG I don't know. He doesn't give me the same impression and Reader did.
The lie is he was clear day one and only, the Rhodens were in danger.
Now he says there was notjing to say they were in danger really, they had 9 Rhodens
So all Rhodens were on as much danger when they made those statements as all people named Jones due to people named Jones being killed.
They also said they offered protective custody and that isn't a normal thing.
we need some widespread attention to things like addiction recovery services--not to mention economic recovery in places like Pike County where folks are putting food on the table by making illegal things grown out on the back 40.
Now reporters are stating that besides marijuana, the Rhodens had the dogs and roosters for fighting.
http://www.cnn.com/videos/justice/2...encia.cnn/video/playlists/ohio-family-killed/
Yeah they go always, in plainclothes. They said they would also be there as security, not normal.I'm thinking they also want to see who came and didn't come. They're taking down license plates, and running them, I'll bet money on it. The killer(s) could very well be at the funeral tomorrow or the visitation tonight. If they know the family it would look out of place if they don't show up.
It seems like they were being cautious. It would have been indescribably irresponsible to tell the Rhodens they were completely safe when they had no idea if that were true. They were asked if the family was targeted, they went on the assumption they were. They didn't have information there was no ongoing threat to the remaining family. The sheriff said he told the family he would arm himself in their shoes. The AG's recent comments didn't contradict the original statement, they seemed to clarify it.
And while protective custody may not be a normal thing, neither is 8 dead family members at 4 locations.
9/11/2001 the state highway patrol closed the roads around the state Capitol and the parking garage under it. Downtown Columbus was nearly on lockdown with all the other state and city agencies being secured. There was never any information released that there was a credible threat, but in the immediate aftermath with an absence of information it was probably a wise move.
Back of Chris' property...
I'm thinking they also want to see who came and didn't come. They're taking down license plates, and running them, I'll bet money on it. The killer(s) could very well be at the funeral tomorrow or the visitation tonight. If they know the family it would look out of place if they don't show up.
He has multiple pages. He has multiple my spaces alsoPerhaps I'm looking at the wrong fb page, but I don't see gang signs. I see a middle finger.
He might not intentionally put himself in this..
He KNOWS he is in a mess.
Oh I understand that, but the bigger picture is this..He's having to step in because Gov. Kasich is out of state, running for POTUS. Kasich has been out of state for most of the past year and anytime something big happens, DeWine steps in as leader/spokesman. News media has been reporting for several months that DeWine intends to run for governor at the end of Kasich's term. Kasich has never enjoyed serving as governor, never wanted the job. He's happy to let DeWine take care of things.
He said they basically had no reason to tell the Rhoden's they were in danger, other than the 8 dead bodies. Which is not a contradiction to what they said before, since they never said there was a threat to the remaining family members. They were pretty clear they didn't know the motive, and cautioned the remaining family to be alert and protect themselves. They offered protection, since they didn't know if there was further danger.You are missing the point. The man has lied. He said they basically had no reason to tell the Rhodens they were in danger.
Their actions and words have proven otherwise.
He said they basically had no reason to tell the Rhoden's they were in danger, other than the 8 dead bodies. Which is not a contradiction to what they said before, since they never said there was a threat to the remaining family members. They were pretty clear they didn't know the motive, and cautioned the remaining family to be alert and protect themselves. They offered protection, since they didn't know if there was further danger.
i think you're reading too much into the politics of this. In a political sense, what they said wasn't clear and couldn't stand up to scrutiny down the road. In a common sense-sense, they acted wisely.