It is absolutely in the attorney's interest to release that report - one, it raises issues about her competency to stand trial anytime soon, which is beneficial for his client, as the longer this drags out, the more the immediate outrage, grief, and curiousity/interest in the case fades. Two, in Oklahoma, it is the prosecution who has the burden of proof that Adacia was sane at the time of committing this crime, so the more he continues to push the mentally ill angle, the more he taints the potential jury pool, possibly making it harder for the prosecution to prove she was sane (not that I necessarily buy it, just saying what his reasoning might be).
Anyway, I do believe she is somewhat mentally ill to some degree, and doesn't give a rat's *advertiser censored* what's out there about her, just like she didn't give a rat's *advertiser censored* about the innocent people she took out when she decided to kill herself - if indeed that's what she was trying to do.
Hypothetical question though - let's say she was diagnosed as bipolar, and was prescribed medications and had stopped taking them suddenly - some of those do have psychotic breaks, suicide as possible side effects when you stop them. I wonder if that would qualify her as not being sane at the time of her crime?
Also, I think at this point, the toxicology reports are almost irrelevant - regardless of whether she had drugs or alcohol in her system, the charge is second-degree murder, because now they have evidence that she purposely ran through those barriers. Other than I'm just really nosy and want to know.