I agree! Thankfully, the majority of posters have been very respectful and kind in their comments. I know most want to focus on the case at hand and not some of the speculations and other religious questions that are occasionally cropping up.
Any opinions are welcomed on this thought....the Holts were married in 2010, the Heichels married in 2011..Wondering if Holt asked WH out before she was married and she turned him down. Maybe Holt, as fragile a mind/emotional state that he has, maybe resented her, never getting over her..
Also did WH put a fight while at the Lake in the SUV...did LE check her nails for Holts skin if she tried clawing at him. Did Holt have any scratches on his face, arms, etc?
The ensuing days will tell us this...Am wondering if he didnt intend to kill her and only "scare her"...maybe he thought out she would submit to Holt like an affair to keep it quiet or else he would use force at any time he wanted...Then maybe Whitney struggled in the SUV, put up a good fight and Holt freaked and shot her...shooting her 4 times in such as brutal rage was his way of "fixing" her for good since she denied him of his dream/goal to be with her...he knew having Whitney wasnt happening..
No. I've seen your posts. I guess it's what you're NOT saying that has my curiosity.
At some schools, a 3.35 GPA is not difficult to maintain. Do the work and show up to class and you're there.
Plus, you have no idea what classes he took, either. At my high school there were definitely the dumb classes and smart classes and in-between classes. If he carried a 3.75 taking honors and college courses, then yeah, I might be convinced he's not an idiot.
I have a degree in Special Ed with an emphasis in Gifted Ed. Believe me, I've seen the gamut. And, though this is just my opinion, I believe with this achievement (even in an easy school) he was not moronic enough to take a plate off and leave it on the mountain so the body could be found, not stupid to enough to drive around town dropping evidence here, there, and everywhere, and not stupid enough to hide his smoking guns at his office and at the police station.
I believe with this achievement (even in an easy school) he was not moronic enough to take a plate off and leave it on the mountain so the body could be found, not stupid to enough to drive around town dropping evidence here, there, and everywhere, and not stupid enough to hide his smoking guns at his office and at the police station.
Slightly OT . . .I recently watched an episode of mythbusters about slapping sense back into someone as is seen often in movies. Someone is hysterical and they get slapped and then are able to calm down.I have a degree in Special Ed with an emphasis in Gifted Ed. Believe me, I've seen the gamut. And, though this is just my opinion, I really don't want to split hairs about his course schedule. I believe with this achievement (even in an easy school) he was not moronic enough to take a plate off and leave it on the mountain so the body could be found, not stupid to enough to drive around town dropping evidence here, there, and everywhere, and not stupid enough to hide his smoking guns at his office and at the police station.
Thanks for your good comments, msthinksalot...
(I'm having problems with the multi-quote, so will try the old-fashioned way).
[*]This comment about the utility vehicle being that of a worker taking his/her lunch is very plausible. I've stopped and had lunch in my car at the far end of a parking lot many times. But, Holt had just murdered someone, disposed of her body and is driving around in a stolen car with blood stains and a fully open window (it was cold and rainy that Tues) trying to ditch it and he's anxious as all get-out -- so he'd avoid parking near unfamiliar cars, especially a parked vehicle where someone is sitting in the driver's seat eating lunch. He'd keep his distance. The tree didn't block surveillance of the SUV driving in and backing into the parking space; it didn't block the view of the utility vehicle parked in the same area -- but it somehow blocked the view of Holt's exit from the SUV, the direction he took, and any action that may have occurred between the two vehicles. If the cars were even 3 parking spaces apart that's a huge tree canopy. If you get a chance, get on Google Earth streetview and take a look at that area. Reporting that a tree blocked the camera -- even mounted any distance from any direction -- and compromised the surveillance between the two vehicles seems not plausible. Hard to imagine Walmart would allow a large area of their parking lot to go un-monitored. If I get a chance I'll drive by the parking area.
[/LIST]
Excerpt: "given the fact that he had no phone... we would have to consider that he would have had to have had the person's phone number memorized and that he had to track down a payphone (and those are actually kind of hard to find these days, I've noticed)."
- We actually don't know that Holt had no phone on him. He threw into Roslyn Lake the phone he had been using that he stole from Clinton in August. That doesn't mean he went without a phone that morning. Before he had Clint's phone he could have also had a cheap no-contract $15/month phone with all the necessary numbers at hand.
And yes, the Febreze might have been in her car--which I posted a few pages back will be easy enough to prove if it has her fingerprints on it. I was only expressing difficulty with the idea that they lifted "a fingerprint" off the bottle. It it was his bottle and not Whitney's, I just couldn't see him marching into Walmart (or wherever) after the crime, with blood splatter all over his shirt from shooting her at close range...and checking out with a bottle of Febreze.
-snipped by me-
I wanted to comment on this portion of your discussion. If we are talking about a camera that is on the Wal-Mart building, a tree that is towards the front of the parking lot, and the vehicles in question at the back of the parking lot. Isn't it possible that the object in the front of the video would block more of something in the back of the image than if the tree were closer to the vehicles? Do my ramblings make sense?
We have different approaches, I guess, as well as different usages for the word moron. You've already tried and convicted the guy before the trial, where a lot of evidence and unexpected lines of questioning could come out. Not sure if you saw my earlier post, but even if a guy confesses to a crime, it doesn't mean he by necessity DID do it. Even if a guy confesses to doing it, the court has to prove/agree he did it by a careful examination of the evidence at trial.I believe this man is a moron.. why am I convinced? Because he kidnapped, raped and murdered a woman (and then CONFESSED to it).
I'm sorry just because someone gets good grades in school doesn't make them "smart". Any person who will kill another innocent human (for nothing but his own pleasure) is an idiot regardless of his IQ
this is just my opinion
SBM...
Those are totally valid points.
I drove by that Walmart on the Friday evening after Whitney vanished, but it was already dark. I think I got there right around 9pm. I didn't go in that first entrance off NE Sandy, because I didn't realize I'd already arrived, so I went in the larger entrance... I think it's the next one down, right next to the bus stop. I noticed cameras all along the roof of the building and cameras on some light poles once you turn left or right at the end of this sort of median thing (if you don't drive straight forward towards the building upon entering the parking lot, if that makes sense?). Those seemed to be pointed to catch the front view of your vehicle as you turned, but I don't recall seeing them facing towards the street or that particular corner of the parking lot.
<Snipped for space>
Thank you, NJ, I thought of this and remembered the "perspective" lessons a thousand years ago in art class -- you have to keep size and distance in mind while you imagine viewing something. Here was the answer I gave myself on this thought you raised: No point in the having the expense of surveillance if you allow a tree or trees to block a large area you want monitored. If you get a chance, get on Bing maps and plug in 45°32'34.12"N 122°25'21.07"W (that's all you need -- it will take you right to where Holt parked her SUV) -- view the area through Bing's Bird's Eye option, toggle around for different angles and ask yourself, what tree is blocking the view of only the space between Whitney's SUV that was parked in front of the lamp post (yellow base, parking slots abutt Sandy Blvd) and whereever that utility vehicle was in the Northwest parking area.
As for an accomplice, my take is it's possible. The "mystery utility" vehicle that left the parking lot. <modsnip>
And the question where did Holt stay when he left his wife to "clear his head", <modsnip>.
I believe with this achievement (even in an easy school) he was not moronic enough to take a plate off and leave it on the mountain so the body could be found, not stupid to enough to drive around town dropping evidence here, there, and everywhere, and not stupid enough to hide his smoking guns at his office and at the police station.