curiosityscat
Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2011
- Messages
- 275
- Reaction score
- 40
JAQUIE1 = You are absolutely Fabulous! For posting such great detailed information!..Really, You deserve each accolade you get & more!..[emoji1376][emoji16]..Thank You!!...
Also, Sorry, but Im a firm member of the, and Sorry to say this...and I Apologize for doing so, but...
Its quite obvious to most reasonable individuals that Anna was likely no longer alive beyond 03/28/17 + the offer to discuss via phone...I believe that it wasnt Anna who accessed her computer on 03/29/2017, no was it Anna texting those responses to anyone...
(Imho), it was simply a ruse by the husband looking to cover his tracks, while he figured out what to do, or did what needed to be done...likely due to having killed Anna on the 28th during an argument of some kind...just my own views given the proposed evidence...I believe that he initially thought that he could put any/everyone off, and then convince them that Anna had run off of her own free will, and that as he didnt know anything, and he and his so were the victims, having been abandoned, so why bother him with it...kind of a scenario, but much to his consternation, that b.s. story didnt fly with Annas loving friends and family, and that is when the husband no longer attempted to hide behind false texts or pretenses...and fake reasons...*shrugs*...
...and as to his failure to participate or life even an eyebrow to locate his missing wife, or to interact with her family and friends?...Well, (in my mind), I chalk that up to his desire not to get caught, or prosecuted in the media, like so many other murdering husbands...(Scott Peterson for one), who learned intimately just how vicious the media can be when it comes to getting to the bottom of a story...*shrugs*...thats my stand on this case...
I used the term above of..reasonable individuals, intentionally, as that is a criteria for prosecuting beyond a reasonable doubt in absence of a physical body...*shrugs* just sayin...personally, I believe that given that information, a jury would find her husband guilty if LE were to put him on trial....(btw, there is a lawyer who specializes and consults for the prosecution nation wide, on cases where there is no body)...just sayin
***Note:The above is only my own opinions, thoughts, theories; unless otherwise indicated by a website URL and/or reference to an origin source..Thanks!
Please note: My Thank clicking is glitchy & often does not register or subtracts mine after Ive clicked someones, Thank..Please know that I am Thankful for your Help/Support/Humor/Etc!..so, THANK YOU!
The TRUTH WILL OUT!, and There will be a Reckoning, in this Life or the Next!
Also, Sorry, but Im a firm member of the, and Sorry to say this...and I Apologize for doing so, but...
Its quite obvious to most reasonable individuals that Anna was likely no longer alive beyond 03/28/17 + the offer to discuss via phone...I believe that it wasnt Anna who accessed her computer on 03/29/2017, no was it Anna texting those responses to anyone...
(Imho), it was simply a ruse by the husband looking to cover his tracks, while he figured out what to do, or did what needed to be done...likely due to having killed Anna on the 28th during an argument of some kind...just my own views given the proposed evidence...I believe that he initially thought that he could put any/everyone off, and then convince them that Anna had run off of her own free will, and that as he didnt know anything, and he and his so were the victims, having been abandoned, so why bother him with it...kind of a scenario, but much to his consternation, that b.s. story didnt fly with Annas loving friends and family, and that is when the husband no longer attempted to hide behind false texts or pretenses...and fake reasons...*shrugs*...
...and as to his failure to participate or life even an eyebrow to locate his missing wife, or to interact with her family and friends?...Well, (in my mind), I chalk that up to his desire not to get caught, or prosecuted in the media, like so many other murdering husbands...(Scott Peterson for one), who learned intimately just how vicious the media can be when it comes to getting to the bottom of a story...*shrugs*...thats my stand on this case...
I used the term above of..reasonable individuals, intentionally, as that is a criteria for prosecuting beyond a reasonable doubt in absence of a physical body...*shrugs* just sayin...personally, I believe that given that information, a jury would find her husband guilty if LE were to put him on trial....(btw, there is a lawyer who specializes and consults for the prosecution nation wide, on cases where there is no body)...just sayin
***Note:The above is only my own opinions, thoughts, theories; unless otherwise indicated by a website URL and/or reference to an origin source..Thanks!
Please note: My Thank clicking is glitchy & often does not register or subtracts mine after Ive clicked someones, Thank..Please know that I am Thankful for your Help/Support/Humor/Etc!..so, THANK YOU!
The TRUTH WILL OUT!, and There will be a Reckoning, in this Life or the Next!