Jethro4WS
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2016
- Messages
- 6,054
- Reaction score
- 35,234
My working theory is that LE has little evidence of Anna being dead other than no signs of activity nor evidence of any other crime with Anna as a victim thus no one can be charged for anything related to Anna at this point. If somehow someone manages to find her body I would expect things to change rather quickly.Jacquie - have you heard anything at all about where the DA stands on this case? I'm torn. Part of me wants to write to him to urge him to bring charges, but at the same time, I'm positive that this is on his radar. He's very good at his job, so my default is to assume he's holding off for a reason.
Thus my working theory has been that Anna was killed somewhere away from her home. I have been hopeful that LE had pulled phone records for both Anna and her husband, pulled GPS information from her vehicle, determined where her vehicle traveled and when, and pulled cellular tower records from the area in those time frames and identified any other phones in the vicinity that also show up elsewhere - making it a bit of a needle in a haystack problem.
I have also been optimistic that when Anna's vehicle was found that cadaver dogs were brought in to check the vehicle. You can try to clean a vehicle all you want but the scent of a body will get into places that are simply inaccessible without taking the car apart. Thus my working theory that had Anna been killed elsewhere (or at home if I am wrong) her body was not transported in that vehicle and that would mean that either Anna met someone at a location where she was killed and then her vehicle was driven to Charlestown Meadows or Anna met someone at Charlestown Meadows and was driven to where she would be killed in another vehicle.
Since LE had brought in dogs when they conducted the search at the house I assume they were cadaver dogs and very possibly the same cadaver dogs that were used in finding the young men that were killed and buried in Bucks County as the dogs had been used there just the day (or two) prior. With that in mind, my expectation is that the dogs did not hit at the house and thus Anna was not likely killed there. If the dogs had hit on anything that search would not have ended as quickly as it did.
And just to finish the thought, I believe that what Anna's husband described about Anna leaving the house and what she was like was true only that it did not happen on April 10th but rather on March 29th and likely not in the morning. This by no means excludes the most likely suspect only that in my theory there is another individual involved and, for my theory, that person is the one that actually killed Anna. While I believe law enforcement knows who this individual is they lack the probable cause to pursue it properly.
Absent any new information from LE I am highly unlikely to change my focus on where to find Anna - which would be a relatively easy to access place with remote characteristics such as park and nature areas or along roads less traveled. I doubt highly that Anna was buried, or covered/hidden. She is likely within 50 to 100 feet at most of a path, trail, or road.
I could be wrong about all of this but that is, and has been, my thinking on this case.