TrutherSleuther
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2019
- Messages
- 62
- Reaction score
- 650
Regardless of if the mother thought it was the best for him etc. etc. it’s clear negligence and I’m not sure how people can justify it. It wasn’t an arrangement where she knew for sure that it was the best situation for him. That is clear to me based on the fact that she knew “step dad” worked but was unaware of who was caring for the child. She should be in direct contact with that person as well and be aware of what happens in his day to day life. No responsible parent hands their baby over to someone who isn’t blood related based on the assumption that they will be okay. If it were a case where this is really what she felt was the best for her son then she would have made sure that it definitely was, she was relying on other people and their words when it’s HER baby. Not having regular contact with the baby is detrimental to the child, she created no normalcy for him. She couldn’t visit him a few times a week or have dinner with him or spend time with him at all just because she is raising an autistic child??? Such bs. There is no excuse. I would cut her some slack if something happened to him and she actually was on top of everything like she should have been and people were presenting her falsehoods, but she wasn’t even checking up on him.
Also, why weren’t her other family members helping take care of King while she was caring for her daughter? Many families have severely autistic children and don’t have more after that and just pass them over to someone else because it’s too hard. If she truly felt that King not being in the home was best for him then there are SO MANY ways she could have gone about it but she chose a very unfavorable route and is now paying the ultimate price. I have no doubt in my mind that she is devastated as a mother and of course she didn’t mean for this to happen, but this was clearly not a good situation for King. Even if he got out alive I wouldn’t be surprised if he dealt with abandonment issues to a certain degree later in life. It just wasn’t a healthy situation for a baby all around. She neglected his needs and expected others to do her job for free. She had an autistic child already when she decided to bring King into the world. He was dumped by her pretty quickly. He’s her responsibility and she had plenty of time to get her act together. MOO.
Also, why weren’t her other family members helping take care of King while she was caring for her daughter? Many families have severely autistic children and don’t have more after that and just pass them over to someone else because it’s too hard. If she truly felt that King not being in the home was best for him then there are SO MANY ways she could have gone about it but she chose a very unfavorable route and is now paying the ultimate price. I have no doubt in my mind that she is devastated as a mother and of course she didn’t mean for this to happen, but this was clearly not a good situation for King. Even if he got out alive I wouldn’t be surprised if he dealt with abandonment issues to a certain degree later in life. It just wasn’t a healthy situation for a baby all around. She neglected his needs and expected others to do her job for free. She had an autistic child already when she decided to bring King into the world. He was dumped by her pretty quickly. He’s her responsibility and she had plenty of time to get her act together. MOO.