sreshowtime
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2010
- Messages
- 6,502
- Reaction score
- 116
longtallcold, what do you mean a rewind? If you are referring to scanner stuff, there isn't one here on this case that I am aware of
It does not state what time the call was made, as compared to the first we see it took LE 3 mins to arrive.
No i meant the neighbors slipped in while the kids were sleeping a perhaps removed K from the apartment. This would be their motive for regaining control of the late night noise situation. They were perhaps so angry if the kids were stomping to get them ticked off/being quiet when the LE came back from the 2nd complaint. The neighbors knew that this was going to be an ongoing problem each weekend and no one would do anything about it. So while the kids were asleep, they slipped in the already unlocked apartment and removed K and now she is missing. I am just speculating, but there is a motive if you consider the previous disputes.But why would she answer the door for the neighbor when she didn't open it for the police or even move inside during that time?
And there was apparently no sign of a break in?
I was typing my last post when you posted this.
Some reports I saw that the 2nd call was made at 4:12 and others say the officer was there from 4:12 to 4:36
I just know how kids are. They can really be lame about locking up. Yes, it could have been locked. Like I said this was just speculation on my part.The apartment wasn't necessarily unlocked overnight. I assume that when the friend left in the morning, he unlocked the door to go out and shut the door, leaving it unlocked
Maybe they..he did know it was LE at the door. I just have a gut feeling he don't have anything to do with her being missing. I remember how crazy I could get after a night of drinking. I can see them stomping and banging just to tick the neighbor off. Then turning out the lights and laughing when LE shows up.
I wanna know why they aren't looking at the surveillance tapes that are close to the apartment, or even in the hallways of the apartment. That would explain just about everything if you ask me. Or the cell phone records.
Also, why the hell won't they release the boyfriend's name, the "male friend"'s name, and the neighbor's names. Maybe people have information about those individuals that they are not sharing because they aren't certain who they are. And what about her friends that were at the bar with her? Was she dancing with anyone? Who drove? Was her male friend at the bar too? Was he even drinking since he had a car at her place too..
Better question: What kind of friend just leaves their friend's apartment without saying goodbye or wondering where she is after the night they just had. If her dog, phone, keys, car, SHOES, were all there and she wasn't in the shower or anywhere in the apartment... I'd do a little bit more than send her a text message after I left.
JMO, but I think the stomping/banging was an attack.
I already did speculate that as an attack and do firmly believe that the male guest should be given careful examination. Trying to keep the options open, my other theory was one that offered more of a motive shifting blame to the neighbors because they would have a motive to do something to end the problem of the nightly disturbances. How else would it get solved. Therefore, both parties (the male guest and the neighbors downstairs) should both be given careful consideration and examination in the act of this missing girl. Not blaming one or the other, but keeping all options open JMOIf the friend was making the stomping/banging noises trying to fool around with her. He sees police lights or car and quickly turns off the lights, once they are gone he does whatever needs to be done. States that he left at 730..we don't have any witnesses to confirm that he left her apt at that time, just he was on video in store after then.
That could be the case that they didn't want any trouble -- only thing is, there was already trouble and it wasn't the first time for disputes. Apparently, there were disputes with the neighbors and the 2nd floor apartment other times according to the other neighbors.Just got done reading the entire thread. Wow...such crazy information slowly coming out. Here is my two cents. I am a festival goer....i cannot see someone of that lifestyle (or drunk for that matter) antagonizing the cops by pretending to be asleep or stomping on the floor to pi$$ the neighbors off. People in that circle usually don't want trouble from anyone, especially the cops. I believe the stomping and noises were an attack (as stated above, the neighbor has motive). I am taking the sleeper and bf out of the equation b/c as far as we know they have alibis (right???). Did she smoke....could they smoke inside? Maybe she stepped out for a cigarette (or just fresh air, a phone call, etc). I def. think something happened at that duplex and the answers lie close!!!
not duplex...apartment building I suppose
So, the neighbors are angry (just hypothetical) especially after everyone returns to each of their apartments....after the first LE call.
The kids antagonize the neighbors by stomping on the floor.
When the 2nd complaint is filed, the LE knocks at the door and no one answers the door, they pretend to be sleeping. LE leaves the scene.
K and her guest go to sleep after LE leaves.
The neighbors are really angry by now because K and her guest didn't answer the door and played it off like there was no disturbance.
While K and her guest are sound asleep, the angry neighbors slip in K's apartment because it probably isn't locked =it wasn't locked when the male guest left that morning. The neighbors remove a sleeping K and now she is missing. They were angry enough to do something like this because they knew that this problem of evening disturbances was never going to get resolved.
They figured that they would handle it themselves. That was the motive.
JMO