I think that there is a working assumption here and elsewhere that unless law enforcement releases all its leads, they are not doing their job.
Furthermore, I think that we assume that homicide cases, like CSI cases, are solved in relatively brief periods and if they aren't, the police are at fault.
Actually, thousands and thousands and thousands of murders remain unsolved year after year. (Since 1980, that toll is more than 200,000.)
In this case, with the convergence of local and state investigators, I think that it is reasonable to assume that forensics were done in the apartment building that have not opened that possibility of a crime scene there.
On the other hand, I think that the absence of a body and, as far as we know, of sightings of Kortne outside the house, leave the investigation at a relative impasse in terms of leads that would benefit from public appeals.
Furthermore, I think that we assume that homicide cases, like CSI cases, are solved in relatively brief periods and if they aren't, the police are at fault.
Actually, thousands and thousands and thousands of murders remain unsolved year after year. (Since 1980, that toll is more than 200,000.)
In this case, with the convergence of local and state investigators, I think that it is reasonable to assume that forensics were done in the apartment building that have not opened that possibility of a crime scene there.
On the other hand, I think that the absence of a body and, as far as we know, of sightings of Kortne outside the house, leave the investigation at a relative impasse in terms of leads that would benefit from public appeals.