Intheknow78
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2016
- Messages
- 12
- Reaction score
- 0
I feel a need to respond to that, no disrespect intended here, either...
The family is obviously distraught and confused as to why LP left and they seem to be unclear on the meaning of LP's note(s). It also was revealed LP may have been in distress or under duress when she left, and likely was when she constructed her note(s).
Given that, it is reasonable to think the family as unable to 'decipher' LP's note(s) because LP's state of mind may have affected her to the point where she would not make sense to even her family and friends... as she was 'not herself' or was experiencing something no one in her family or circle of friends were privy to understand.
Even though "numerous professionals" schooled in the art and who no doubt may cite numerous notches on their collective belts were unable to determine the this-or-that, it is reasonable to think there may be others, "professional" or otherwise, who could have that one experience or insight that could further advance interpretation of evidence.
Is that likely? Who knows, but the possibility exists. Take for instance this real-world event: college-aged individuals were able to develop proteins that thwart antibiotic-resistant bacteria while for years "numerous professionals" in the field have been thwarted themselves in their efforts in developing such a solution: http://www.npr.org/sections/health-...teins-to-thwart-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria
What if those individuals had been shut out of the process? Would we still be waiting for professionals-schooled-in-the-art to hit on a solution perhaps years later and one not as effective?
Again, no disrespect intended. During my years (in various ventures unrelated to this topic but the concept applies) I have observed situations in which "experts" were stumped or unknowingly lacked ability and outright refused help or did not believe anyone else could do what they could not.
It pains me to believe cases (even if it's only one) may have gone unsolved or were broken beyond repair because one or more professionals were unknowingly short-sighted or were unable to think beyond text-book or didn't have that extra bit of experience that could have helped solved a riddle.
We know, or at least we expect for such instances to be very few and far between, but to dismiss the possibility someone other than family, friends or LE-involved-in-the-case could hit on something others have missed is, to be frank, short-sighted.
It makes full sense not to disclose content of a note(s) or release additional information if doing so could jeopardize an investigation or endanger those involved.
It does not make full sense (usual caveats aside) to believe only those individuals who have so far observed certain evidence are the only ones who could possibly solve the riddle. Why does it not make full sense? Because the riddle remains unsolved.
That makes sense but how many different opinions should law enforcement consider and the more opinions they include the less clear the truth becomes. They certainly aren't going to release the contents of the note publicly for any random person to put their interpretation in the mix. They will gather their info from the people who know LP best and whatever experts they choose.