In his interview with WNEP, Scarcella described Barbour as "very meek, very mild" with a "very low voice."
"She never hesitated once," he told the station. "She never gave the impression of it was a rehearsal."
Scarcella said he eventually asked if she had any remorse.
"And she said, 'None,'" Scarcella told WNEP.
But that's not what Scarcella said he found most surprising. That would be, he said, "the fact that she said that if she got out she would do it again.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/17/justice/craigslist-thrill-killing-confession/index.html?c=&page=0
Well, I believe most can see that this individual is at the VERY, VERY, VERY LEAST a dangerous individual, who has proven that she's fully capable of viciously killing a completely innocent stranger for no reason, or motivation, other than for the "thrill" of it.
For me, this alone, all by itself is plenty enough for those in the states attorney office to do EVERYTHING within their power to ENSURE not only a conviction, but one that carries a sentence that disallows for any chance whatsoever for this person to ever be released back into society..jmo.
That much I feel very certain of..
Regarding the above snipped quote, also very much drives home my point even more.. This individual is every single bit a psychopath with absolutely no feeling whatsoever for her fellow mankind(people who have NEVER done anything to her, people that are completely innocent, people who are absolutely and completely UNKNOWN to her).. The above quoted words of this individual I have zero problem at all believing them to be accurate and fully genuine.. She has no remorse, she feels nothing whatsoever about slaughtering a completely innocent stranger..and furthermore she flat out states that if ever given the chance at freedom again she'd not hesitate to slaughter any other human beings who have the severe misfortune of having crossed paths with her at a time, and point in which she's decided she'd like to once again feel that thrill, that high, from slaughtering an innocent person.
As far as her new claims of serial killer proportions..well, I'll just say that I am not near as convinced, or certain, about those as I am about the above mentioned.. I agree with those who've opined that this is quite likely attention seeking behavior, as well as I agree with the poster upthread that made mention of the all too obvious grin, and gloating as seen on the video clip..
ITA with tlcya regarding what's likely true, not true, and what are "possibly" true.. The one victim I do see as a likely possibility at this point in time(other than LaFerrera) is her baby's daddy that was killed(tho, I don't recall if we know anything other than just the fact that he is dead).. If its learned that he was murdered, well, I'd say there's a damn good chance that this individual is who is the responsible party..
But regarding her serial-killer-type number of victims.. I am just not at all certain, or convinced of.. Now, if we come to learn that she is in fact responsible for the dozens of murders that she claims, will I be shocked/surprised?
Absolutely not, as IMO, this I know for certain-->>This chick is every bit a psychopath, and is fully capable of viciously murdering innocent, complete strangers for no other reason than for $hits and giggles!
All jmo.
