Springrain
Who was she? Pregnant & stabbed to death
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2015
- Messages
- 4,708
- Reaction score
- 16,242
Sad that it had to come to this, but you handled it very well. Signed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"She is known only by the nickname “Beth Doe,” a term that online sleuths picked posthumously for her."
The name Beth Doe did not come from online sleuthers. My understanding is that there was another unidentified girl at the time who was called "Jane Doe" so investigators called her "Beth Doe". Her gravesite at the potter's field has a white cross and a small stone with Beth Doe on them (they were there long before her exhumation).
Has Patricia M. Laemmerhirt or Mildred Louise Butterworth Roche been looked into?
http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/l/laemmerhirt_patricia.html
http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/r/roche_mildred.html
OK--just to clarify because some people don't see the point of the petition.
People look different when they're dead. Tammy Jo Alexander's relatives looked at her PM photos and they weren't even sure if it was her or not. Those photos were not graphic. They could see the strong resemblance with Carl's recon, when he takes into consideration the changing of appearance during death.
My point is, Beth's PM is more unrecognizable than a normal PM. Her nose was cut off, so obviously the area was bloody and disturbing, graphic. Her eyes and forehead, chin, were not mutilated, but they had lost pigment, and anyhow most of the focus would be on the mutilated nose. It'd be really hard to recognize a dead friend/relative with her nose chopped off.
People do not think that they can recognize her from it. They want to gawk at the mutilated face of a young woman.
In short, even though the people of Websleuths are well meaning, it is much more likely this photo is there for people to gawk at the tragedy. It cannot be used for ID purposes, because her face took so much abuse, she would be pretty much unrecognizable.
Telling the Internet to not do something is like telling a terrible two not to do something.
They will get even more interested, and they will push you out of the way to do it.
Anyone with not nice intentions who sees the petition will now look this picture up and spread it.
I am sorry, but that is how it works.
It's not nice, but I appreciate at least now there will be more people knowing about her, until hopefully the right person sees it, and the police can do their job.
They/ she has not been identified for almost 40 years.
If she's identified because this awful image is spread around, even in the most darkest places of the internet, will you still complain?
I have much respect for yours and others in this threads opinions and it's noticable how close you are to this girl and how you want to protect her dignity, I understand that.
However, the picture is out there now.
And, to me, it doesn't look at all like the same girl in the reconstruction that's been around for years, so someone recognizing "Aunt Sally" from this pic (or even the newer reconstruction by Carl) than the other one is just more likely.
That is just my opinion.
I'm very sorry you're upset about this, but please try see the positives in the negatives.
On some descriptions she is listed with only having a mole on her left check, and in others they also list one above her left eyebrow as well. In some of the composites it does show 2 moles. I also looked over the isotope information and it got me looking for missing females in Europe. One case I came across is of Annastaes Banitskas. She has both of the same moles on her face in her photo and in an age progressed photo, although in the description it only indicates the one on her left cheek. She went missing in Australia, but she had moved there from Europe with her family. The timing when comparing to the isotope results is a bit off, and I don't know a lot about those tests and the accuracy, but maybe she should be looked into. The family thought she may have ran off with a boyfriend. She took most all of the family photos the day she disappeared, and they only had this photo listed.
To me it looks like that photo could have been taken when she was much younger, but it doesn't say what age she was when it was taken. Here is an Article from last year http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...eve-alive-hiding-fallen-pregnant-just-15.html And here is her Doe Network info http://www.doenetwork.org/cases-int/31dfvic.html