raisincharlie
Racing Doesn't Lie
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2004
- Messages
- 16,856
- Reaction score
- 141
I also wonder if the DT didn't want him to testify because he was going to establish that JA was not in abusive relationships her entire life and she wasn't a victim. There whole mitigation seems to hinge on that perspective, hence her mother not testifying on her behalf either.
You got it, DB says their relationship was not abusive. Direct contradiction to what the DT is trying to claim in their mitigating factors. The same is true with Mum - unless Mum was willing to lie and fall on the sword, she couldn't say Jodi was abused either. If what the murderer said in her post conviction interview is true, that her lawyers said she had no mitigating factors, it is likely Nurmi was being brutally honest with her because he knew the truth. Today's hissy was in response to JM simply doing the job he is required to do and Nurmi's frustration with a controling client who has prevented him and Wilmott from the doing their jobs as required. At this point I suspect neither of her lawyers were willing to subjorn perjury on the murderer's behalf, thus, call no witnesses and let it go.