Penalty Phase #13

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I also wonder if the DT didn't want him to testify because he was going to establish that JA was not in abusive relationships her entire life and she wasn't a victim. There whole mitigation seems to hinge on that perspective, hence her mother not testifying on her behalf either.

You got it, DB says their relationship was not abusive. Direct contradiction to what the DT is trying to claim in their mitigating factors. The same is true with Mum - unless Mum was willing to lie and fall on the sword, she couldn't say Jodi was abused either. If what the murderer said in her post conviction interview is true, that her lawyers said she had no mitigating factors, it is likely Nurmi was being brutally honest with her because he knew the truth. Today's hissy was in response to JM simply doing the job he is required to do and Nurmi's frustration with a controling client who has prevented him and Wilmott from the doing their jobs as required. At this point I suspect neither of her lawyers were willing to subjorn perjury on the murderer's behalf, thus, call no witnesses and let it go.
 
Just a quick question, does "plea the fifth" preclude Womack from testifying on behalf of Jodi?
 
I really think we need the attorneys thought on this. It is very strange indeed. I just have a hunch that the last few days of this trial have been more about the strategy for appeal. Kinda like watching an NBA playoff when my team (always the one facing off with the Lakers for some reason) would just send in the bench and hope for a better game in the next round (or that Kobe would fall off a grandstand and break a leg - ;))

Speaking of NBA and death threats> cray cray people are everywhere.

http://www.foxsanantonio.com/newsroom/top_stories/videos/vid_15587.shtml

1/2 OT.
 
I'm just so confused about why Darryl Brewer cannot testify on JA's behalf? I realize the defense is probably setting her up for appeals, but it seems strange to me that he was all set and ready to go and then the defense basically gave no reason for why he was not allowed to testify. It was like it was a package deal, either both witnesses testify or none. I'm utterly confused.

I also find it bizarre how her ex of several years focuses on what a good worker she was, time and again. I mean, that's his takeaway? She was a good waitress?

Am wondering if it was a tactic by the defense to set up appeals by not allowing Darryl to testify? This is just crazy, this was a witness for the defense. In Darryl's interview he said he was stalled and then learned that he was not going to testify with no reason given. Something stinks here!
 
omg!!! who better to speak about her childhood??? Let's see...Pattie or MOM/DAD/SISTER/BROTHER???? Hmmm...what do you all think?
 
I think he is referencing her mental state since 'magical thinking' is a term often used in Mental Health to allude to people experiencing cognitive distortions.

That is what I thought he meant...and that when she joined PPL and the Church her mental state declined.

Maladaptive daydreaming to soothe anxieties is sometimes linked to BDP also.
 
That and they don't want to let go of the $2500 a day per Attorney paycheck Willmott and Nurmi are getting off of the State of Arizona Taxpayers. It's a travesty how much those attorneys have abused the taxpayers.

$2500 a day for just showing up in court for less than an hour??
 
did db say he left her in that video? i thought she left him?
 
IMO
Something is up about the Mom and other direct relatives NOT testifying. There is some sort of devious plan about that. Think about it, they sit there every day and yet they are not going to say anything to save her life. I cry FOWL. Something is up and I dont know what devious plan it is, but one thing for sure.....

There is a plan and them not testifying is part of it.


:rocker: You are right on here ... "something is up" !

And I have NO doubt the relatives are "in on it" ... MOO !

I sure wish we KNEW what her "devious plan" is -- I am so tired of trying to figure it out :banghead:

JMO but I am planning for the UNexpected tomorrow ...

I think she is going to go "over the top" ... :waitasec: if that is possible !

:seeya:
 
So because Pattie couldn't talk about her childhood friendship then DB couldn't talk about his adult relationship with her (as per what JC says on After Dark). Mom and Dad can talk about her childhood and Sis can talk about her adulthood as she testified that they had a good relationship...I don't get it...what a kerfuffle!
 
$2500 a day for just showing up in court for less than an hour??

Maria Delarosa (mitigation specialist for JA) has billed AZ for 100 hrs @ $100 per hour = $10,000. :facepalm:
 
Yeah, and she was just using Daryl because she needed a home and security, for all we know he may just have been a guy that presented no challenge, therefore nothing to go postal over.

When they met, she probably respected the boss, as most everyone else did.

When he was no longer the boss, now paying child support and probably alimony, with both of them upside down in that Palm Desert house that was to be her entrée into the real estate mogul lifestyle, DB as JA's gravy train was derailed.

He should thank himself every day that he didn't make her the beneficiary of a very large life insurance policy.
 
omg!!! who better to speak about her childhood??? Let's see...Pattie or MOM/DAD/SISTER/BROTHER???? Hmmm...what do you all think?

Yeah, but there's a whole bunch of people DB swears are very supportive of CMja. They just all love her, but sorry, they all can't testify.:facepalm:
 
People on Levi Page think Jodi is going to get up on the stand and beg for death, same reverse psychology she tried on the interview.
 
so because pattie couldn't talk about her childhood friendship then db couldn't talk about his adult relationship with her (as per what jc says on after dark). Mom and dad can talk about her childhood and sis can talk about her adulthood as she testified that they had a good relationship...i don't get it...what a kerfuffle!

fubar
 
It almost sounds as if the DT sabotaged Jodi's defense! I don't get it.
 
I first heard the phrase "magical thinking" when googling BPD.
I bet DB first heard it when using google to try to figure out WTF is wrong with CMJA.
 
Am wondering if it was a tactic by the defense to set up appeals by not allowing Darryl to testify? This is just crazy, this was a witness for the defense. In Darryl's interview he said he was stalled and then learned that he was not going to testify with no reason given. Something stinks here!


I agree. The DT has some devious plan with all this. JVM earlier said he was in the hotel next door waiting to go and the DT did not call him. So, from what I heard he was ready and willing. The DT probably purposely did not call him, and then later they are going to say that there was some kind of confusion and that is what they are going to base their appeals on.

It is all a DT tactic and I sure hope the judge has asked for help in her rulings to be sure things are done right. The DT is trying something and this DB thing and the mom not testifying are all part of it IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
81
Guests online
2,678
Total visitors
2,759

Forum statistics

Threads
601,248
Messages
18,121,101
Members
230,995
Latest member
MiaCarmela
Back
Top