Woe.be.gone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2008
- Messages
- 13,022
- Reaction score
- 226
All I know for sure is in a few minutes I am going off to dinner and an
evening looking at stars and planets... best to all here. Shalom.
sawadee ka.
All I know for sure is in a few minutes I am going off to dinner and an
evening looking at stars and planets... best to all here. Shalom.
Background information on examples that gambling addiction can lead to murder
http://www.ncfpc.org/PolicyPapers/Findings 0101-Gambling Add.pdf
His father (who has a line of credit at a casino in Aruba -- sign that it runs in the family?) allowed an underage JVDS to gamble
BOTTOM LINE - ACCORDING TO JOHN Q. KELLY
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' - April 11, 2006
JOHN Q. KELLY, HOLLOWAY FAMILY ATTORNEY: ... And it’s sort of ironic that it’s his father who brought his underage son to a casino and left him there after he left, with access to his line of credit, to put this unfortunate chain of events in process.
You know, if Joran had never been there, not been allowed in there, because he’s underage and wasn’t accompanied by his father, the whole rest of the night wouldn’t have happened.
RITA COSBY, HOST: You know, and, John, also, why would that be a significant—why is that in conflict to something else we’ve heard maybe from Paulus before?
KELLY: Well, he’s just claiming that, you know, he’s kept an eye on his son, you know, he’s kept him on a short leash, and, you know, his son is very well-behaved. And it turns out that he’s, you know, got him at casinos. If you’re under 18, you’re not legally even allowed in casinos, so his son was breaking the law with him enabling it.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12150698/
Apologies in advance if this is ''old'' to some of the more seasoned WS folks -- I am trying to back up what I feel IMHO is a driver to his chaotic motivation in the SF situation
I see it as fatalistic on Joran's part:
What did he say over and over in Lima: "I didnt want to do it!"
He knew he was a road to destruction.
I'm not talking conspiracy theory now. My analysis of this case is just as valid as yours, or anyone else's.
Facts- we have been told, so far, that: there was no murder weapon found (direct quote from the head of the police investigation); a baseball bat was found; a tennis racket was found; there were multiple stab wounds; there was a bloody mess everywhere, and the body was horribly mutilated, with Stephany's brother graphically describing her missing an eye; the body was found fully clothed, face down, wrapped in a bloody sheet; the body was found face up, clad only in a tee shirt and red panties; the neck was broken, but there was no blood other than a trickle from her nose and/or ear; she was actually strangled with Joran's own shirt.
No theory, no conspiracy in this post at all. But plenty of room for skepticism and doubt.
You are missing an important point. You see shifting and changing "facts" and "evidence." What you are really seeing is a "to the minute" newscycle throwing anything and everything they see and hear out there the minute they see or hear it.
It's not like it used to be. You hear on the news that someone was killed. You don't hear anything for awhile because it took awhile for reporters to get there. It took awhile to start the actual reporting. It took awhile to call the reporting in. It took awhile to get it printed or edited. There used to be a time gap that does not exist anymore.
Again, what you see as changing evidence is simply unfiltered reporting. It does not change the core information we have. You can have any opinion you want to, but you can't change the core facts.
And, with all due respect.......Maybe you are simply trying to force your opinion into an unlikely scenerio because to do otherwise provide a threat to your "book deal"?
MOO
I'm not talking conspiracy theory now. My analysis of this case is just as valid as yours, or anyone else's.
Facts- we have been told, so far, that: there was no murder weapon found (direct quote from the head of the police investigation); a baseball bat was found; a tennis racket was found; there were multiple stab wounds; there was a bloody mess everywhere, and the body was horribly mutilated, with Stephany's brother graphically describing her missing an eye; the body was found fully clothed, face down, wrapped in a bloody sheet; the body was found face up, clad only in a tee shirt and red panties; the neck was broken, but there was no blood other than a trickle from her nose and/or ear; she was actually strangled with Joran's own shirt.
No theory, no conspiracy in this post at all. But plenty of room for skepticism and doubt.
Everytime I hear Stephany's father, or read his words, my heart just breaks for him. It's just unimaginable what he and all of her family are going through. I saw photos of her being taken from the hotel and also thought it seemed more dignified than a body bag. :cry: MOOThanks to whoever posted the interviews with Stephany's father in the media thread. If you listen to the very last one, I think it clears up whether or not those NE photos are real. Her father says he did not want her going out of the hotel in a plastic bag. He had a coffin delivered and the police helped him. She was "carried out in a grave digger's drawer (coffin) like a human being should be".
This video of the 'wine tossing incident' is pretty telling. Joran apparently admits that his anger was building up and he "couldn't control" himself. Note his expression as the interview ends, you can see it on his face!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyZEM7ECohs
I think that's his mother seated next to the interviewer when this occurs.
MOO
You are missing an important point. You see shifting and changing "facts" and "evidence." What you are really seeing is a "to the minute" newscycle throwing anything and everything they see and hear out there the minute they see or hear it.
It's not like it used to be. You hear on the news that someone was killed. You don't hear anything for awhile because it took awhile for reporters to get there. It took awhile to start the actual reporting. It took awhile to call the reporting in. It took awhile to get it printed or edited. There used to be a time gap that does not exist anymore.
Again, what you see as changing evidence is simply unfiltered reporting. It does not change the core information we have. You can have any opinion you want to, but you can't change the core facts.
And, with all due respect.......Maybe you are simply trying to force your opinion into an unlikely scenerio because to do otherwise provide a threat to your "book deal"?
MOO
What is the cause of death?
What injuries did she sustain at the time of her death or immediately before her death?
How and when was her body found and by whom?
What is the actual timeline for Joran [the dates regarding the extortion plot, the dates and countries he was in prior to being taken into custody by Peruvian officials.]
Are there 2 missing women in Columbia from the dates he was there? Was he even there?
What is the timeline for Stephany?
Did she know Joran prior to them going to the room?
Did she know about the Natalee case before going to the room with him?
Whose room was it?
I have read multiple versions of so many things since this story broke that I would appreciate some definitive answers to some of these simple questions. I agree much of it is the 24 hour newscycle and irresponsible reporting, but after several days and such intense coverage, I would expect some parts of the story to begin to gel.
Great points, Flow.
Also means 'No worries'. Sure seems like this doesn't apply any more. I wonder if they do tattoo removals at Castro Castro!!
MOO
These are only great points if you are completely ignorant to the facts.
Most of the misinformation is coming from elcomercio.pe and some other blogs. Also, newscasts, which have been extremely inaccurate.
If everyone limited themselves to credible sources like msnbc, abc, fox, (print articles only) etc... the amount of misinformation would drop to a minimum. Although I have seen some bad stuff from mainstream media, it's been a very small amount.