attached ...
I saw that when I googled the bottle that was in the photo....
bottle was blue and had more printing on the front......
I wonder what it was?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
attached ...
I am beginning to see van der Sloot as a loner and complete fraud who
may not know what happened to Natalie! But he would use it as long as
he could because in reality he has nothing else. I think 99.9% of everything that comes out of his head is a lie and worse. He is a very disturbed fellow who has been WITHOUT ANY TANGIBLE SUPPORT for years. He's bad at poker. (Would you pay to get advice from him about
gambling?) I cant see friends or criminals supporting him in any way who would expect an actual return-in-kind. Sure has had lots of transient friends but so do fish in the sea. Its amazing to me he chose "my private life" as his trigger for killing Stephanie .... he has no private life, he has no LIFE! He's a joke. He just happens to be big and could kill or maime you
if you are half his size .... that's his one claim to fame. He's a monster.
And he knows 'he's full of s____.'
I think his father and his father's buddies disposed of Natalie and nobody
told him where or how - they knew Joran was incapable of dealing with
anything. His psychological evaluation says he has only an average IQ
with 'hints' of anything better but unsustainable due to his emotional
overlay.
That's Joran.
]Greats Van Sustren
"Coincidence" is an inappropriate term for media, hotel or LE underling speculation prior to the release of forensic evidence. It wasn't forensics changing the story. And even if it was forensics changing their opinion, the idea that changing "evidence" (speculation) is proof of a conspiracy is a non-sequitur. One does not evince the other.
Last year I spent a week at a Port A mega condo complex on the beach that had maid service. I asked not to have maid service and it was honored. No mystery at all, not to mention the hotel reviews that say this is common at that hotel without asking. Not all countries have the same hotel service Americans do, and even when they do, you can waive the services.
Nor does lack of hotel service evince a conspiracy. It's just lack of service or bad service, or bad business, but none of these point to a conspiracy. It's like saying that because the air conditioner in the hotel wasn't working, the murder was obviously a conspiracy.
That is, it may have been a conspiracy, but so far, nothing presented points to a conspiracy. It just points to human error, cultural differences or bad customer service. In fact, there is a mountain of evidence to the contrary, not the least of which is JVS's recent implications that it was a conspiracy. If JVS says something, that alone is extremely strong evidence against the proposition in and of itself.
Also, it's a very presumptuous statement to say that most people think conspiracies are illogical. Every parent becomes a master conspirator while raising kids, starting with the Tooth Fairy & Santa. It's not that we cannot "think outside the box" as you believe you can, it's just that there's no evidence inside or outside the box that points to conspiracy. And "no evidence" of a conspiracy does not point to a conspiracy either ;-).
I will say that my ankle was at an unnatural angle at first (foot in extension position, i.e. hanging down). The paramedics put it into a temporary splint until I got to the E.R. It was still 3 days before I received my first cast at my Orthopedist's visit. He slowly changed the angle back to normal over the course of 8 weeks with re-casting it.I am really glad for you that you didn't experience the level pain that I witnessed in the passer-by that I mentioned in my post. Her foot was at a most ''unnatural angle to her ankle'' (makes me feel uccky thinking of it). She was talking and then very much unable to speak and went totally white. I am glad that you were ok.
What I find disturbing--or rather mind boggling, is when he started on his rampage of telling stories regarding NH's demise(s) and being paid...why didn't the parents reel him in then? Totally incorrigible and uncontrollable?
I am thinking that picture 15, might be the blood in the hallway.
http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-504083_162-10003848-15.html?tag=page;previous
Seems like there was a lot of blood in the room and therefore, I suppose it could have been on his bag which maybe brushed against a wall. Wouldn't matter which hallway it was then.
What I find disturbing--or rather mind boggling, is when he started on his rampage of telling stories regarding NH's demise(s) and being paid...why didn't the parents reel him in then? Totally incorrigible and uncontrollable?
I've been told that there is no evidence of conspiracy
. Now we have you posting that Paulus and his "buddies" disposed of Natalee's body. What possible evidence do you have in this regard?
Others are now postulating a very Hollywoodesque motive for Joran- he despises women. This is, of course, in contrast to the numerous snide references in the media to him as the "Dutch playboy." It also is in contradiction to the many media reports at the time of Natalee's disappearance, which tended to portray Joran as a popular kid who easily attracted females.
I don't think any conspiracy theory that has been postulated is more absurd than these pseudo-Dr. Phil-like, pop psychological assessments that are proferred every day on this forum (and others), but more imporantly on national "news" programs, by allegedly ethical professionals. We're all speculating, and my speculation leads towards conspiracy.
So when she never left the room for three days, no one thought to check on the room, and the status of this well known woman?
very shortly they or somebody would have (as we know).So when she never left the room for three days, no one thought to check on the room, and the status of this well known woman?
Don't we have video (the only video that shows him saying anything during this, to my knowledge) of Joran looking confused and asking the authorities, "I'm only saying that I understand my rights, correct?"
If so, that seems to be a pretty strong indication that he was being misled about what he was signing.
Why didn't they reel him in? Because of his violent, uncontrollable temper.
I'm sure they've experienced it many times over.....his wrath must've come down on their heads often. Just look at the abuse he did to his younger brother?
They should've checked him into a facility then but they moved him to his own private quarters. That was their way of dealing with him.
Out of sight out of mind, but that only gave him time to do just what he wanted to do with no one censoring his actions.
IMO
I saw that when I googled the bottle that was in the photo....
bottle was blue and had more printing on the front......
I wonder what it was?
That video is of when he was being official transferred to the Peruvian LE....NOT when he was signing his confession!
What I find disturbing--or rather mind boggling, is when he started on his rampage of telling stories regarding NH's demise(s) and being paid...why didn't the parents reel him in then? Totally incorrigible and uncontrollable?