froginTtown
Active Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2010
- Messages
- 905
- Reaction score
- 41
I'm Loving This....What a turn around... Before it was VDS who was like "prove it".. Now its the other way...The Peruvians are saying.."prove it"...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha.. the Sloot (I like that).. not to be confused with The Sleuth (that's us). I'm thinking he took her pants off b/c there may have been something on them that would tie them back to him. Like maybe she scratched him and his blood were on her pants or something. I'm guessing if they say she had no signs of sexual assault that it's true. Maybe the taking off of the pants was for an non-sexual reason.
As I posted earlier -- once Mommy gets there, he will tell her that they forced him to confess -- and he will use her as a mouth piece for the cruelty he went through.
She'll make the rounds on what a great boy he is.
Book it.
I wouldn't call it speculation exactly! I either just copied the wrong post or ???? I thought it read the Dutch authorities took exception that a criminal profiler speculated he showed classic signs of psychopathy???
If there was "barbaric" coercion off camera, JVS will have to prove it. My impression from reading the Dutch editorial was that they have no specific allegations against the Peru authorities other than objections to the way JVS was paraded in front of the media with a bullet-proof vest. They felt making him wear the vest was prejudicial to public opinion.
It seems somewhat hypocritical for the Dutch media to object to JVS treatment as prejudicial, yet they also imply the Peruvian authorities are barbaric without presenting any evidence to support that claim. Goose, gander.
Link to CNN story
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/06/08/netherlands.van.der.sloot.media.wrap/
I just don't see Joran "going out for coffee", or for any reason, and leaving her in his hotel room all alone. They had just met. Wouldn't he be hesitant to leave someone in his hotel room, with all of his personal belongings, when he barely knew her?If he was worried about her knowing who he was he wouldn't be using his real name to begin with. What I am saying is she wasn't rifling through his computer and being a snoop, she opened to her home page and was confronted with his name and Natalie's news story.
He was out getting coffee or whatever he was doing, he may came back to an upset girl who was no longer going along with whatever he was trying to achieve from having her there.
He may have had her car keys since we have not seen that video of him coming and going yet. If he walked into a different mood then the one he walked out of, she is demanding her keys, trying to get dressed, and the laptop is open, he flipped out because he has the anger control of a two year old.
Could he of made Stephany take off her pant so she could not leave the room?
To humiliate her at the end???
She still had a bra, a shirt on her top area.
Could he of made Stephany take off her pant so she could not leave the room?
To humiliate her at the end???
She still had a bra, a shirt on her top area.
Oh cry me a river!!!! Poor little Joran!! Can we expedite that prison sentence? I'm sick of him already!
Maybe he thinks they are barbaric because he was treated so nicely in Aruba when questioned about Natalee.