Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess I don't see anything all that perplexing about what happened cause that's what would have happened (PO or PD/LE would have found out long ago) if anyone ever had their eyes open before this.
As the parole agent was on the phone with the officer, he observed that Garrido was accompanied by his wife and three young girls. After completing his conversation with the officer, Garrido’s parole agent wisely isolated the females–including Garrido’s wife–to identify them. The oldest of the three young females identified herself as Alyssa, the second oldest as Angel, and the youngest as Starlet. During further questioning, Alyssa advised that she was the girls’ mother.
Anthro, I think you are missing this part - the report is zipping through all this very fast and minimally telling the story:
Thank you time. I didn't read it that way at all, and I'm still not 100% sure that's accurate, because if it is then that puts Jaycee deviating from the script in a BIG way very shortly into the interrogation.
The story PG tells is that all 3 girls are PG's brother's children. Why would Jaycee then change and say that she was their mother? What do you think happened?
I'm thinking she asked for the lawyer in Garrido's or Nancy's presence for show. What crime had Jaycee/Alyssa committed? She didn't need a lawyer- it was to get on Garrido's good side- stick to the script if she was going home with him.I know ... I've read it several times every time a question comes up. It looks like a typical police report made up from all the notes the individual interviewers made. I think she probably only deviated from the script under pressure. Being interviewed that way and forced to come up with answers is a lot different as I said that just rehearsing a script or memorizing a script. Garrido couldn't have prepared her that completely - for one, there just are no answers that are acceptable once they started pinning her down. I think that's what happened.
Jaycee tried to get out of it - I think twice she says she wants a lawyer. She had no idea what she was asking because where was that going to get her? It wasn't going to get her out of revealing her identity in the end. She tried various things, but I think (the way it sounds), they came back after Garrido told them he was the kids father and even that he had kidnapped and raped her, what was she going to say then. And, as My2Sisters said, they might have already pulled up a picture of Jaycee as they were searching for missing girls. I'm sure at that point, it wasn't difficult to tell they weren't going to buy anything less than the truth.
Another thing - the whole ordeal probably lasted much longer than it seems by just reading it in the report. I'm wondering how much Nancy was freaking out and what she said too.
They aren't telling us every detail, but then that wasn't the purpose of the report.
The next morning, August 26, 2009, as Garrido arrived at the parole office, the parole agent spoke with the UC Berkeley police officer, thereby obtaining a more detailed description of her interaction with Garrido and her concern about the safety of the two young girls. The parole agent was surprised at the officer’s description of the girls’ relationship with Garrido because the agent believed that Garrido had no young children. As the parole agent was on the phone with the officer, he observed that Garrido was accompanied by his wife and three young girls. After completing his conversation with the officer, Garrido’s parole agent wisely isolated the females–including Garrido’s wife–to identify them.
Didn't all the stories start out as those being his Brother's kids? Let's start with that point.
Anthro, I think you are missing this part - the report is zipping through all this very fast and minimally telling the story:
As the parole agent was on the phone with the officer, he observed that Garrido was accompanied by his wife and three young girls. After completing his conversation with the officer, Garridos parole agent wisely isolated the femalesincluding Garridos wifeto identify them. The oldest of the three young females identified herself as Alyssa, the second oldest as Angel, and the youngest as Starlet. During further questioning, Alyssa advised that she was the girls mother.
If he didn't trust her not to crack, and didn't want to get caught, why would he bring her along?
I'm thinking she asked for the lawyer in Garrido's or Nancy's presence for show. What crime had Jaycee/Alyssa committed? She didn't need a lawyer- it was to get on Garrido's good side- stick to the script if she was going home with him.
No. JC's story was that she is the girls' mother. PG's initial story was they are all 3 his brother's children. I see nowhere in the report where JC ever said she or the girls were PG's nieces. PG is the only one with that story. And, in fact, he was already telling his version the day before he brought everyone with him to Concord. If he was already telling this story the day before, why wouldn't JC also be telling that story??? See pages 4 & 5.
One question would be considered further questioning. One question, like, "What is your relationship to one another?"
No. JC's story was that she is the girls' mother. PG's initial story was they are all 3 his brother's children.
Just a guess here, but possibly they said that the story of the girls being his nieces was to "protect Alyssa". (Being an abuse victim). This would open up the chance to tell the other story. I believe Jaycee said exactly what she was told to say.
This is truly the $1,000,000 question. Luckily none of us think like pg!! Heaven only knows what his motivation to bring the girls to the appt truly was.
I find it very interesting that there is a report stating that jim molino knew pg's secret. I would love to see the article as that makes him an accessory after the fact. Correct? If so, why is he not in jail?? If he did know, that kind of blows Cheyvonne out of the water with her claims of innocence. Songline, could you please point me in the direction of the article? Thanks!!