This is a possibility. Except, why wouldn't PG tell the women he had already given them the "children belong to a relative story" the day before? I'm really having a hard time believing that PG, being the control freak that he is, didn't offer some type of story for them to give the PO. JC didn't come up with asking for a lawyer on her own, her right to request an attorney likely isn't something she learned in her first 11 years. It is something she learned from the G's. This indicates, to me, that she was coached. Also, somehow he knew she requested a lawyer and inicates as much in his "JC's rights were violated" spiel to Gray a few weeks later. I think he told the women what to say and that he was bringing them with him for JC to verify he had permission to be with the girls and UCB. It makes no sense that PG would bring them along to try to erase doubt in the PO's mind but fail to tell the women what they should say. I don't think he expected them to not be questioned, otherwise he wouldn't have needed to bring them.
PG gave one story, that the trio are sisters and his nieces from his brother. The next story he gives is that he is the father of the 2 girls, after being questioned by CPD for a short while. JC, on the other hand, immediately reveals her relationship to the girls as their mother, NOT their sister and sticks to this story until the CPD is called, then she changes to the abused MN housewife story, still not implicating PG of any wrongdoing and maintaining this story when questioned by CPD. Finally, and only after PG admits to the PO that he kidnapped and raped her, she reveals her true identity. It seems that PG caved rather easily and definitely before the women. Why was JC giving one story and PG another? Why was JC's story different than the story PG gave the day before she was even questioned? If he coached her about asking for a lawyer and that he had permission to be with the girls, why wouldn't he also coach her that she should say they're his brother's kids? If he brought them to try to verify that she was the relative that had given him permission to be with the girls, why does his story differ so greatly from hers?
Yes, he's a nutjob. Yes, it's probably pointless to try to figure out what that lunatic was up to. But the point of this thread is to vote and discuss whether or not he wanted to get caught. I'm just trying to figure that out because it has occured to me that he did and I have questioned, from the beginning, whenther or not he did want to get caught. To me, if he was losing it and forgot what story he was supposed to tell, why would he tell the PO the same exact story that he told the day before but fail to share this story with JC & NG to tell? It just doesn't add up, JMO.
The absence of any statements made by NG in this report doesn't help answer any of our questions and only raises more questions. I understand why statements made by the girls would be absent, since they're minors. But, the absence of NG's testimony gives me the feeling that it has something to do with her turning state's evidence...It seems as though she is doing what she can to break his grasp of control over her, as well. Maybe she's starting to realize that he threw her under the bus for his own sick, self-gratifying reasons.
Of course, my theory is only my opinion.