The lawyer discussed this in the huffpost discussion linked above. He said that Cosby's public statements (as to how much he can defend himself) are restrained by the risk that if he says they're lying they can then sue for defamation and then he'll have to be deposed, and he can use his fifth amendment rights not to say anything but then in a civil case it will look bad for him.
Maybe that's what got him to publish the statement saying that he did not intend to say Constand was a liar earlier...her lawyers threatened to sue and there might be something weighing heavily on their side in the sealed evidence from the earlier settled case.
He can afford to pay but I don't think he wants to be deposed. If he rambles incoherently in a deposition like he rambles in his interviews it might not be too good.
Deadline has a link to the legal document
http://deadline.com/2015/05/bill-co...ion-rape-allegations-marty-singer-1201430792/
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/05/20/us/bill-cosby-sued-by-dickinson/
Daily Mail reprinted the lawyer statement that she's referring to:
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...abricated-lies-photos-case.html#ixzz3al8Lw4os
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
I wonder what the lawyers thought about defamation lawsuits at the time they posted this.
The legal document states that at the time she wrote the book she told about the rape to her ghost writer and publisher who both told her that they can't disclose it in the book. I'm assuming they will be called to testify to that effect. Also there is a reference to a 2006 interview with Howard Stern saying Harper Collins told her to omit stuff that Bill Cosby did.
Dickinson and her lawyer in a recent video interview:
http://www.etonline.com/media/video/et_exclusive_janice_dickinson_is_suing_bill_cosby-164869/
They're saying the witnesses are already on oath saying that she told them about this years before others came forward and that they asked Cosby to retract the statement but the request was refused.
Hm but he can arrange more PR events so that he can be seen in more places that Martin Luther King went to, in the hopes that there is honor in association (the opposite of guilt by association). If he's following in King's footsteps he must be a valiant defender of all black people's rights and an overall good person, amirite?