After watching/hearing ALV, Samuels, Dr. M-F, and Geffner I'm thinking your Psych PhD on WalMart Rollback is more credible than their credentials on K-Mart's Blue Light Special.
LOL. I remember the blue light specials. They were hilarious. I'm old.
After watching/hearing ALV, Samuels, Dr. M-F, and Geffner I'm thinking your Psych PhD on WalMart Rollback is more credible than their credentials on K-Mart's Blue Light Special.
When she describes these fictional stories of abuse she always describes Travis saying "*advertiser censored**ing sick of you b****" or *advertiser censored**ing kill you *****". It's never I'M sick of you or I'LL kill you. It's very bizarre and awkward. I wonder why?
Anyway, great clip of her stupid lies.
Missing my thanks button as well!
The letter and other testimony elicited by Juan yesterday opened up a true can of worms for the defense. The jury now can ponder these facts.
1. There is a strong possibility that Jodi and Travis were never "official," a term Jodi uses as though it's a promise ring.
2. Jodi inflicted terrible pain on the victim's family through letters and her defense case in the retrial. This will put in perspective the highly emotional VIS made by Samantha and Steven.
3. Jodi lied on the PTSD test. When it comes time for Geffner's test administration, they will see she changed up her story a couple of times.
I know there's more, but the defense team must now be in major cover-up mode.
On another issue, Nurmi's been given time to submit his motion for dismissal of the DP or the whole case again. It will NOT be honored by JSS. She's already ruled not to sanction Juan for accidentally spilling MM's name in court. It's all more defensorial piffle.
I clicked the thanks button in spirit. Yeah, I know y'all are right, but how could she? How could she? How could she? I just don't understand it.
I am so glad that Juan brought up Point #1. I remember some discussions about that on here within the past 6 weeks or so and I think this is a distinct possibility.
Also, I truly believe this letter will be her death knell. And how fitting that it is her own words that would do her in. Not big bad Juan and his alleged "prosecutorial misconduct", not MDLR and the rest of her supporters thinking everyone lives in a state of denial about kiddie *advertiser censored* (I really think that is what MDLR was referring to in her twitter). No one to blame but her evil, twisted self.
Was thinking about Sandy's necklace today. Interesting choice for someone whose daughter said what she said about her in her secret testimony...
I am only able to access trial information for short periods of time and I miss so much. Could someone tell me what the mom's necklace is? Also, where can I read the letter referred to. Thanks so much.
I am only able to access trial information for short periods of time and I miss so much. Could someone tell me what the mom's necklace is? Also, where can I read the letter referred to. Thanks so much.
Did anyone else not sleep very well last night, thinking about that letter and what it revealed about the killer?
I feel very sorry for the jurors. The shock and horror of reading about the letter secondhand was bad enough. They saw the letter up on a big screen, heard the words read out loud, sat in the same room with the thing who wrote it, could see the reaction (which had to be anguish) of Travis' family as it was read.
And heard about the viciousness of the murder, in her own words, the first time the murder itself has been mentioned since October 30, 2014.
I bet they think about that letter all weekend, even though they try to put the trial aside.