I don't understand why there needs to be oral arguments on the request to release the transcript of testimony. The COA ordered it. What's there to argue?
Nothing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't understand why there needs to be oral arguments on the request to release the transcript of testimony. The COA ordered it. What's there to argue?
I don't understand why there needs to be oral arguments on the request to release the transcript of testimony. The COA ordered it. What's there to argue?
Oral argument scheduled for February 6? Hopefully that is a typo and Jan 6 is what's meant? Or has JSS already conceded that the trial will still be in full swing through February? Whatever happened to her resolve to at least set a deadline, even if there is no hope she'll bother to enforce it?
Hey everyone, Good morning Thanks to everyone for the tweets and for posting. I just saw a photo on FB from yesterday of Juan Martinez smiling. nurmi and JW are looking at something, some papers, they are not smiling, but Juan Martinez is smiling. I'm thinking it's got to be something good for the prosecution, right???
I do not believe the jury is buying anyof this. But I do think one or more will hang the jury, not out of sympathy for JA but just because they won't vote for the DP. And they will see the judge as an enabler.
I don't understand why there needs to be oral arguments on the request to release the transcript of testimony. The COA ordered it. What's there to argue?
Dr. Geffner said he interviewed 10 people. Can we figure out who they are? He mentioned some, but not all, IIRC.
- Brother Carl
- Aunt Sue
- Former boyfriend Matt McCartney
- Former boyfriend Darryl Brewer
- Laura, sister of Darryl Brewer
- Friend from teenage years
- Former co-worker, male
- ?
- ?
- ?
It did not seem as if Geffner interviewed her parents, which is sketchy.
I thought I saw a tweet that said Geffner had interviewed one of Travis' friends.
AZL can say whether I'm off target, but I don't even think this is legally proper at this point for her to do that. What she should say is e.g. "I'm releasing it at 3pm this Monday" and then it's up to KN to try to get a stay before that time. If he can't, then she releases it. End of story - there's nothing to discuss or argue in her courtroom since she already was instructed to release it.
AZL can say whether I'm off target, but I don't even think this is legally proper at this point for her to do that. What she should say is e.g. "I'm releasing it at 3pm this Monday" and then it's up to KN to try to get a stay before that time. If he can't, then she releases it. End of story - there's nothing to discuss or argue in her courtroom since she already was instructed to release it.
After reading the press' motion I think it is that Nurmi is wanting to hold off until he can appeal to the Supreme Court. They ask either the judge release the transcript immediately or advise Nurmi to file an expedited motion for the sc to review the COA's decision. And it sounds like media anticipated Nurmi would stall in this way.
After reading the press' motion I think it is that Nurmi is wanting to hold off until he can appeal to the Supreme Court. They ask either the judge release the transcript immediately or advise Nurmi to file an expedited motion for the sc to review the COA's decision. And it sounds like media anticipated Nurmi would stall in this way.
IMHO, the SC will pass on this one, anyway.
Did he actually interview them himself? I could have sworn someone tweeted he only READ the previous interviews. Does anyone else remember?