Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I kno and she skooched by me to sit down. July 28 TA BDY. BOOM!!
When he was on the stand in 2013, Geffner "suggested" that DeMarte gave Jodi an IQ test because it was something that inexperienced people did to pad their bill.Cathy ‏@courtchatter · 47s48 seconds ago
Geffner kept refusing to turn over his info to DeMarte without proof that she was qualified to look at it. Ha! #jodiarias
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 56s 57 seconds ago
Juan asks if Geff looked at the ME report. He asks if he knew the letter was written on TA's birthday...
Geff didn't know that. #jodiarias
he doesn't know much does he
No, the attorney for his clinic apparently suggested it. It's just that nothing is ever Geff's (or Jodi's) fault, they never do anything incorrectly, and the fault is always someone else's. Birds of a feather and all that.Lol. Wait I just read the part you bolded. So Nurmi or Wilmott used the wrong thing (that only applies to drugs and alocohol) to say that Dr. G didn't have to show the tests to Dr. DeMarte? :laughing:
Obviously stall tactics.
He himself has had courtroom experience with unethical behavior so I wonder if some of it was due to him being reprimanded to ensure to follow all the rules. At first he may have been just ensuring she was properly liscensed but then it seems like stall tactics were done on purpose.
These hired guns at trials are a disgrace and it makes me feel very sorry for all the convicts who have been prosecuted by such tactics. I even feel sorry for some guilty people if certain prosecuters would use these shady tactics.
It is just plain wrong if they stretch the truth and in some cases openly lie. A person should be convicted or set free based solely on accurate evidence and not generated shady evidence for $$$$. What a crock.
It is depressing to think of how many people have had more lengthy sentences or even incorrect verdicts for such tactics. Neither side should be able to do this and it is just plain wrong.
If the evidence is accurate then fine. But that is not what the DT is portraying in this case.
Gimme some jury questions.
This will be our only indication of where this poor panel of JA's victims are in their individual thought processes after three months of kangaroo court.
No, the attorney for his clinic apparently suggested it. It's just that nothing is ever Geff's (or Jodi's) fault, they never do anything incorrectly, and the fault is always someone else's. Birds of a feather and all that.
I'd pay to see assessments of her psych 'experts'. They have some serious mental health issues all their own.
Even BK just said she doesn't know what point JM was trying to make. Then he brought up the letter JA wrote from jail. Then he said he is finished. Redirect now. What?!!!!
Even BK just said she doesn't know what point JM was trying to make. Then he brought up the letter JA wrote from jail. Then he said he is finished. Redirect now. What?!!!!
Her mom is 5 seats to my left. Can hear whispers but that's it. Geff has resumed witness stand but still in recess. JA take her glasses off when no jury.
Some jury reactions would be great.......
Oh no, re-direct is coming. :hills: