What a horror. I really don't think the passengers were conscious for as long as the reenactment portrays.
Sadly in a lot of inicidents many are - they can tell if there is water in their lungs - means they were breathing at impact. THey can tell time to pass out by blood oxygen levels , the meidcial examiner in the final accident report will be able to tell how many(if bodies are found etc) were, were not, dead, unconsiocs etc etc
I cut a lot out just want to give an idea .Here is an idea of how amazing this stuff is:
4.1 Assigned Seats
.
4.2 Assigned Seats with Recovered Victims
4.3 Assigned Seats with Unrecovered Victims
d.
4.4 Victims with Recovered Seats
4.5 Victims with Seats not Recovered
Thirty-three of 455 seats were not recovered. Remains of all of the occupants of the airplane were eventually recovered.
4.6 Recovered Seats and Fire Damaged Seats
4.7 Body Fragmentation
Bodies were coded according to degree of fragmentation or loss of extremities as follows:
0 (green): Body intact.
1 (yellow): Crushed head or loss of one extremity.
2 (blue): Loss of 2 extremities with or without crushed head.
3 (red): Loss of 3 or more extremities or complete transection of body.
fragmentation.
4.8 Seat Damage
Minimal (light blue): Overall condition of seat unit or seat to include: seat legs, seat pan, seat back, armrest, and safety belt restraint system is intact.
Moderate (dark blue): Overall condition of seat unit or seat is intact with minor deformation to one or more components including seat legs, seat pan, seat back, armrest, safety belt restraint system.
Severe (green): Overall condition of seat unit or seat include fractures or deformation of the seat legs, seat pan, seat back, armrest, safety belt restraint system.
Destroyed (yellow): Overall condition of seat unit or seat is such that at least 2 of 5 component parts (seat legs, seat pan, seat back, armrest, safety belt restraint system) are fractured or missing.
Fragmented (red): Overall condition of seat unit or seat is such that more than 3 component parts (seat legs, seat pan, seat back, armrest, safety belt restraint system) are fractured or missing.
The chart shows the degree of seat damage by cabin zone.
4.9 Body Fragmentation and Seat Damage
4.10 Evidence of Seat Restraint Use
Yes: Seat was assigned and physical evidence, such as belt loading, occupant related deformation, belt cut, belt anchor or anchor with portion of belt was missing.
Likely: Physical evidence, such as belt loading, occupant related deformation, and fastened belt.
Possible: Physical evidence of occupant related deformation, belt loading.
nknown: No physical evidence of occupancy or restraint use.
Of a possible 422 seats recovered, 57 (14%) were classified as occupied or likely to have been occupied during the crash. Seven (12%) of the seats classified as occupied or likely to have been occupied were unassigned seats.
4.11 Victims with Foreign Bodies
T
4.12 Floating Victims/ Assigned Seats
4.13 Thermal Burns/ Floating Victims and Assigned Seats
T
All 8 burn victims were recovered from the surface of the ocean. None of them had severe bums -most of the burns consisted of singed hair and first or second degree bums primarily over their faces, upper arms, and chest. Of the 8 victims with thermal burns, 7 were assigned to Zone C, The remaining victim was assigned to the first row of Zone D, immediately behind Zone C.
4.14 Thermal Burns (including possible)/ Floating Victims and Assigned Seats
All of the burn victims were recovered from the surface of the ocean.
4.15 Thermal Injuries, Fire Damaged Seats, with Assigned Seats
The purp
4.16 Thermal Injuries (Including Possible), Fire Damaged Seats, with Assigned
Seats
Forty-five percent of the seats recovered displayed right deformation, and 36% of
those recovered were deformed to the left. Seat deformation varied throughout all zones in the cabin, except for the upper deck, which is to the right for all 7 seats recovered (78% of the 9 seats installed).
correlation between injury predominance and seat deformation. A high degree of correlation would suggest that passengers
remained in their seats throughout most of the crash sequence. A poor correlation would
4.22 Injury Predominance: Anterior vs. Posterior
. The premise is that forward motion of the airplane with respect to occupant seating and the
protective effect of the seat at the occupant's back, would cause a seat occupant to have predominantly anterior injuries unless he was separated from the seat. The chart further
depicts injury percentages by cabin zone.
One hundred sixteen victims exhibited anterior or posterior predominance of injuries. Eighty-two percent had predominant y anterior injuries and 18 percent
exhibited primarily posterior injuries.
The forward transverse seat frame member can create shearing forces across the femur as the upper leg contacts the seat frame in crashes with a significant vertical force vector. Mid-shaft femur fractures were correlated with evidence of downward loading to the horizontal seat frame in this crash.
There were 39 passengers with mid-shaft femur fractures and 45 seats with evidence of downward loading of the anterior horizontal seat frame. Fifteen percent of victims with mid-shaft femur fractures were assigned to seats with evidence of downward loading.
http://www.100megspopup.com/ark/800AutpsySumries.html