Question...if there was a bomb on board, why would the plane lose speed so rapidly before the crash? Wouldn't it just explode immediately? TIA
I still am having little chuckles mom..........you better check he is not on another computer .............if so delete your post NOW!
Beside the pic of the tail looking ready to fall off sitting at the gate,strutural failure is not an instant thing--think creeking door , it is rivots popping, and then spreading, these are strong birds, structural failure can be low ( relatily speaking compared to a bomb).
The recorders are in the back. If you instantly unplug anything it stops. Bomb in back of plane the recorders just stops. All they have reported on the flight data recorder, is everything before the finale, which we got from ground radar.
The unusual noises reproted for last three days , indicates a lie now, but is congruent with groans and moans of rivots popping , depressuraztion, plane starting to behave oddly, people screaming, oxygen masks deploying , getting bumpy, half ripped the plane sstarts to lose control , not totally sheared off yet, this is the first 3000 foot drop,its getting worse, when 4000 pounds of you fall off what happens, you soar upwards - exactly what happened. TWA did sjust that .
after 3000 feet, with no stablizer (steering wheel) , nose way to high, she stalls, which explains the next 3000 foot drop. as it picks up speed going down , the plane has a tendency to start to rise (lift ) By now more of it is shearing off , Less control, so now she is soaring up, at a very up way , to up, it bleeds off airspped, it stalls again ( the 67 mph deal), it then becomes a brick, no lift , no lift no flight , exactly as reported, no control, falling apart , not flyable, noise , decompression makes a huge white mist, you cant breath, baggage bins are dumping on you, seats are falling off their mounting your legs are being chopped of as the seats fail, , in the cockpit, behind the mist, alarms screaming , winds are just blowing, oxygen masks are flying all over the place , passengers screaming, body parts flying around , passengers slamming into each other, seats failing, hypoxia setting in , it matches a strutural deal not a bomb-- a bomb makes fire , there is nothing burned in the tail that fell to earth - there just is a nicely laid tail. Makes sense, once it detached, it had nothing powering it, makes sense that is would not smash into the ground.
IMO, tailstrike just makes so much more sense, frankly, a bomb, insdie a pressurized tube, blows out. In order to do that , there should be outward forces. There has not been one picture that shows the planes skins blowing outwars - like mh17.
Its kinda like bomb shaking a can of Pepsi violently then opening , or structural is opening it really slow - there is a difference as the pressure has an instant release or a slow hiss out... dloe cracking, strutural makes the difference in pressure less dramatic than shaking a coke can and fully opening it
if we are riding in a van and get rear ended, he folks in the rear are gonna have more metal in them. Metal flying around (tailstrike failure ) is not hot. A bomb is hot metal. There would be thermal (burns) at entry wounds, in addition to penatration.
World of difference between searing metal slamming into your body , as oppossed to metal slamming into your body.
Noone has meentioned thermal wounds- all they have said is the folks in the back, near the tail, had more metal in their bodies than the folks further away. Physics!
There was totaly instant loss of control mh17 instant- the folks in the front, died froms blunt trauma - that is what they have reported makes sense in a vertical nose down impact with earth.
If they can do thermal injuries, residue from an explosive embedded in bodies, (we all know there was no fire on the tail , or on any of the luggage we have seen- the luggage looks a bit dirty but fine - ) a bomb possibly in a baggage hold?
In fact that is how (there was a little circuit board in Lockerbie) that was conncected to the radio, but they were able to determine the exact baggage container the suitcase was placed in as a result of damage, burn patterns , etc
They need to convince colleagues that thermal burns- and residue are in the bodies , imbedded in the seats in the rear,in the bathroom , back galley .............noone has said any of this ..............metal in some folks in the back near the tail .............thats it....again IMO
just mo!
