seems to me jose's strategy is to disparage, discredit, and mock whichever witness he is questioning for the purpose of unsettling them so they will lose their composure and flub up on the stand. When the dog handler first took the stand, jose asked him "what kind of dog handler are you?" the dh replied "a good one." to which jose replied (with his signature smirk) "well we're going to find out." jb's treatment of this man was a disgrace, imo. When he asked him "what did the dog say?" i believe it was to mock this man, who had an apparent love and rapport with his dog. Many posters commented that jose doesn't even have an elementary understanding of dogs, let alone a grasp of their use in forensics. I fully concur.