Do you think it's this?
Terry Elvis wrote:
"In my opinion, this was not a random disappearance, but I believe someone who she knew and trusted may have betrayed her."
http://www.xojane.com/it-happened-to-me/heather-elvis-disappearance-terry-elvis
What gets to me is the word "Trusted."
Somebody that Heather knew and trusted.
IMOO.
Do you think it's this?
Terry Elvis wrote:
"In my opinion, this was not a random disappearance, but I believe someone who she knew and trusted may have betrayed her."
http://www.xojane.com/it-happened-to-me/heather-elvis-disappearance-terry-elvis
What gets to me is the word "Trusted."
Somebody that Heather knew and trusted.
IMOO.
Sorry it this has already been posted, but take a look...
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=10141369
To me it just looks she had a sweater on and took it off once she got in the car/truck and let it fall behind/beside her.
This just comes up as a blank reply to this thread. Did you mean to post
a different link?
To me it just looks she had a sweater on and took it off once she got in the car/truck and let it fall behind/beside her.
I've read the police report which wasn't redacted, read the posts on fb, even those which have since been deleted, and come to a theory I'm sure others have pondered.
Yet, I read this story and there's something...I don't know what, nor do I know why, but something about this story is nagging at me.
Do you think it's this?
Terry Elvis wrote:
"In my opinion, this was not a random disappearance, but I believe someone who she knew and trusted may have betrayed her."
http://www.xojane.com/it-happened-to-me/heather-elvis-disappearance-terry-elvis
What gets to me is the word "Trusted."
Somebody that Heather knew and trusted.
IMOO.
Do you think it's this?
Terry Elvis wrote:
"In my opinion, this was not a random disappearance, but I believe someone who she knew and trusted may have betrayed her."
http://www.xojane.com/it-happened-to-me/heather-elvis-disappearance-terry-elvis
What gets to me is the word "Trusted."
Somebody that Heather knew and trusted.
IMOO.
There is a possibility that Heather thought she was texting back and forth with someone she knew, but it was someone else who easily had access to the "trusted" person's phone. She may have innocently agreed to meet that person to discuss a past/future but someone she wasn't expecting showed up in that person's place. Does this make sense to anyone?
There is a possibility that Heather thought she was texting back and forth with someone she knew, but it was someone else who easily had access to the "trusted" person's phone. She may have innocently agreed to meet that person to discuss a past/future but someone she wasn't expecting showed up in that person's place. Does this make sense to anyone?
There is a possibility that Heather thought she was texting back and forth with someone she knew, but it was someone else who easily had access to the "trusted" person's phone. She may have innocently agreed to meet that person to discuss a past/future but someone she wasn't expecting showed up in that person's place. Does this make sense to anyone?
I could have sworn someone on here who did prev. searches had even gotten an e-mail about it. But there's been so many... I could just be confused.
Also why does this give me an even hinkier feeling?
Rewards have not helped in many cases at all...those "in the know" can't claim them. And anyone with too much information probably has some degree of guilt. I wonder, though, if a relative can claim a reward? JMO rewards make people look twice at a poster, mostly, which is not a bad thing in itself.
I think a person or persons may be more likely to recall details of the time in question once a POI name or possible vehicle description is out there. Hoping this happens soon...maybe a reward can be claimed in this way, by an innocent witness.
JMO
I've read the police report which wasn't redacted, read the posts on fb, even those which have since been deleted, and come to a theory I'm sure others have pondered.
Yet, I read this story and there's something...I don't know what, nor do I know why, but something about this story is nagging at me.
How are you guys understanding the phone calls he made to HE, the ones the night he was taken to the car? I think that's one of the things nagging at me.
I honestly expected the story to say something along the lines of "I immediately called or tried to get a hold of H" when the officer explained which car was abandoned.