AugustWest
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2020
- Messages
- 739
- Reaction score
- 8,540
I think it would be unwise of the defense to call either one. In MS testimony, AM was insinuating 30-40 minutes for his visit time and also mentioned something about helping her with her schooling (IRRC). She even discussed the matter with her brother I believe. That reeks of payoff to me and if AM was willing to 'buy' 30-40-minutes, they can't really claim it would be wrong for the public to help MS with her schooling? IMO it would shine a bright light on the Murdaugh double standard and I don't think the jury would appreciate that. I believe the jury would think AM was just P.O.'d that she didn't acquiesce. jmo
IMO, the defense would tailor the questioning so that she wouldn’t be able to testify to anything other than the issue. Thus not “opening the door” as any other testimony would likely to be relevant.
CoulD be wrong though; these goobers already opened the door wide on character accidentally prior to now.