Drunk by 10am.New drinking game for Friday. Take a shot each time you hear Pawpaw.
I have just finished listening to Waters showing how horrid AM has been, for many years, cheating, lying, stealing: an evil creep.We've had weeks of testimony to that end. It makes sense that Waters would want to confront him with these crimes and humanize the victims but I think we all get it. I'm afraid he's going to lose the jury if he doesn't get on with it. IMO
Why can’t they use it to prove/show bad character?I'm not fully understanding the cross on the financial crimes. The state can only use the financial crimes to show motive -- they can't use it to prove bad character. But the cross seems to be focused on his bad character. I know his credibility is in issue, but I'm finding this messy. JMO.
The jail cannot monitor attorney and client calls or meetings.Really hope the jail monitors his phone calls tonight. You just know he's going to try to make contact with his lawyers somehow.
SC Rule 404(b): Other Crimes, Wrongs, or Acts. Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible to show motive, identity, the existence of a common scheme or plan, the absence of mistake or accident, or intent.Why can’t they use it to prove/show bad character?
LOLNew drinking game for Friday. Take a shot each time you hear Pawpaw.
He probably did it, but I am not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. They truly botched the investigation. They likely would never have gotten an indictment had they not “accidentally” lied to the grand jury twice about the blood splatter report and the shotguns in the house. Never searched the mom’s house, though she was integral to the story from the get go. No murder weapon. Everything is circumstantial, and we don’t know who had the opportunity because LE decided from the start he was the one and never investigated any other possible suspects, of which apparently there could have been a long list. NG, in my opinion,What makes you think he’s not? Who do you think had the opportunity? Because if you feel this way others may too. I am truly curious- no pressure.
I have friends whose kids went to school with the Murdaughs and knew them.I find it jarring that he refers to his son as "Paw Paw". My grandfather is from the south and it is tradition in our family for grandpa's be christened "Paw Paw".
Alex was simply trying to fool the jury into believing that he loved his son so much, that he would never kill him. Cute. Or something. So transparent.I have friends whose kids went to school with the Murdaughs and knew them.
I have been following this thing closely ever since the boat accident, and today - today is the first time I have EVER heard of him being called "Paw Paw".
I don't know what he's on about.
What makes you think he’s not? Who do you think had the opportunity? Because if you feel this way others may too. I am truly curious- no pressure.
He had no empathy or conscience as he stole from these people. No value or care about their lives. Only his. Ego, greed, control, power drove him.I'm not fully understanding the cross on the financial crimes. The state can only use the financial crimes to show motive -- they can't use it to prove bad character. But the cross seems to be focused on his bad character. I know his credibility is in issue, but I'm finding this messy. JMO.
He probably did it, but I am not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. They truly botched the investigation. They likely would never have gotten an indictment had they not “accidentally” lied to the grand jury twice about the blood splatter report and the shotguns in the house. Never searched the mom’s house, though she was integral to the story from the get go. No murder weapon. Everything is circumstantial, and we don’t know who had the opportunity because LE decided from the start he was the one and never investigated any other possible suspects, of which apparently there could have been a long list. NG, in my opinion,
It didn't look like he got to grab his files and notebook. They scooped him up and out the door. Anyone know who the gentleman was in civilian clothes who went through the door with AM and the two deputies???They probably sent him a long task list in all of the notebooks he takes to his cell every night. JMO
I don't know..who killed them. I do know that an addictive person like AM could be like gambling addict and regarding money, also creating untold debts and problems for themselves. then coupled with an opioid addiction, a drug which completely numbs your feelings..this is typical of an addict and I know someone who
was a drug addict and she told me she had no remorse at the time over things she did to loved ones , including stealing money.
there could have been someone lurking on the property..I don't think they have the proof...or a good motive.
to make himself a simpathetic figure? to buy time? why kill your son? I just am not at all convinced. mOO
The jail cannot monitor attorney and client calls or meetings.O