SC - Paul Murdaugh & mom Margaret Found Shot To Death - Alex Murdaugh Accused - Islandton #33

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Regarding the raincoat/tarp "mystery":
1) We have Shelley, the trusted caregiver, stating that Alex showed up at Almeda at 6:30 IN THE MORNING soon after the murders, holding some sort of wadded up blue vinyl.
2) Alex DENIES this EVER HAPPENED. and that's it?

C'mon now, why on EARTH would Shelley lie? Seriously. How could she get that wrong? Alex isn't saying "Oh, it was later than that", he is saying it NEVER HAPPENED. If it NEVER HAPPENED, then that means that either Shelley has decided to completely fabricate a story that will not only put her in hot water with her employers, but also puts her at risk of criminal charges for lying to law enforcement, OR, Shelley has just hallucinated the entire event.
Who benefits from Shelley's lie/hallucination? No one.
If, on the other hand, its true, and Alex is the one lying, if his denial is a lie, we have to ask ourselves the very same question: Who benefits from Alex's lie? If he was there that morning, at 6:30, with a wadded up blue raincoat, why is he lying about it? Guys, this is just ONE of MANY instances in this case where the jury is being asked to suspend disbelief and to ignore common sense.
 
sunshineray said:
I personally think he had someone else gets rid of the guns. I believe they were brought to Almeda and later discarded. JMO
Click to expand...
Maybe that discussion about the farm truck being broken down on the side of the road and the police chief from Yemassee (sp?) that Conrad asked JMM about means something regarding the disposal of evidence?
 
Gut_feeling said:
Regarding the raincoat/tarp "mystery":
1) We have Shelley, the trusted caregiver, stating that Alex showed up at Almeda at 6:30 IN THE MORNING soon after the murders, holding some sort of wadded up blue vinyl.
2) Alex DENIES this EVER HAPPENED. and that's it?

C'mon now, why on EARTH would Shelley lie? Seriously. How could she get that wrong? Alex isn't saying "Oh, it was later than that", he is saying it NEVER HAPPENED. If it NEVER HAPPENED, then that means that either Shelley has decided to completely fabricate a story that will not only put her in hot water with her employers, but also puts her at risk of criminal charges for lying to law enforcement, OR, Shelley has just hallucinated the entire event.
Who benefits from Shelley's lie/hallucination? No one.
If, on the other hand, its true, and Alex is the one lying, if his denial is a lie, we have to ask ourselves the very same question: Who benefits from Alex's lie? If he was there that morning, at 6:30, with a wadded up blue raincoat, why is he lying about it? Guys, this is just ONE of MANY instances in this case where the jury is being asked to suspend disbelief and to ignore common sense.
Click to expand...

I guarandamntee you Shelley was not lying.
 
makayla said:
I’m sure the sheriff’s deputies get great pleasure in escorting AM and sticking him back in the van every day :)
Click to expand...
I would hope that when they claim AM is treated like any other prisoner that returns to jail after being on the outside, he is strip searched, made to bend and cough before he is allowed to redress in his jail scrubs, re-cuffed and escorted back to his cell. jmo
 
Cindizzi said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1630315984375382017
Click to expand...
Interesting for sure, but if the family had not backed AM and let him possibly be convicted of murder and theft, perhaps they could have wiped the slate clean and from this day forward lived as an honest family in the future. I suppose they Never considered that. Someone in the family could have written a book about the stained Murdaugh Dynasty, putting all the shame behind them. Bye bye PM, bye bye AM and the previous skeletons in the closet, we are now going to show the world we have integrity. I guess it’s not possible for a highly dysfunctional family to do that though.
 
I don't know of the blue item Ms. Shelly saw was connected to this crime, but what I do know is Ms. Shelly knew that family. She knew their behaviors and patterns. She was there nightly and it was not common for Alex to be there that late. She felt scared enough with what he said to her the following day and the day after that, that she told her brother about it when it happened. She saw Alex with something blue balled up in his arms. Why would she make that up? She was believable. Then they searched the house and found 2 different blue items, one being a tarp and one being a rain coat. Now they might not be connected, but she saw Alex with one of them and one of them tested positive for GSR. Alex claims he never had any blue thing. So the known liar claims he never had an item and brought it into the house. Then we have a believable witness that did see him with an item. So weather connected or not, he is shady and his actions have been questionable and he's lied a lot.

I do think he had the guns in that blue item and he disposed of them somewhere. I don't know why he put it back in the house, but if it was something that belonged to the family then maybe he thought it would be missed so he put it back. At that point nobody had searched Almeda and he didn't think they would.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 58 more.
Total: 1,661 (members: 59, guests: 1,602)

Online statistics

Members online
59
Guests online
1,602
Total visitors
1,661
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
605,840
Messages
18,193,268
Members
233,584
Latest member
elementpro
Back
Top