Cindizzi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
- Messages
- 10,869
- Reaction score
- 150,222
i've said this before, but I believe a lot of the money was lost in bad business deals. There have been some hints that AM was doing a lot of real estate investing just prior to the 2008-9 recession which wiped out a lot of highly leveraged speculators. Alex was stealing even before the financial crisis, but from what I've been able to piece together it sure seemed like the theft and fraud ramped up in the aftermath.I agree that the money didn't go entirely.to drugs - but I contend it WAS primarily lifestyle. A massive hunting property, the beach house, boat, law school and all associated living expenses for Buster, multiple high-end vehicles, travel via private jet and on and on and on.
I watched the Dateline, good refresher and updates. And thank goodness for Blanca, still taking care of Bubba, Maggie and Paul.
As it seems others of you are wondering about this, too, I don’t understand the state’s agreeing to 27 yrs when AM pleaded to crimes that amounted to potentially hundreds of years.27 years for that? Wow…… with 100 possible? I think I agree with pleas for a ‘thumbs down’ emoji on this forum.
And as others posited, revealing where all the money went and is should be part of any deal. Sort of like a convicted killer leading investigators to the body (or bodies) of their victims.
Makes one wonder if that disclosure is not part of the agreement, might some not want others to know where it is or all went?
MOO
27 years is a life sentence because it takes him to age 81, but I see your point.As it seems others of you are wondering about this, too, I don’t understand the state’s agreeing to 27 yrs when AM pleaded to crimes that amounted to potentially hundreds of years.
Wasn’t part of the state’s goal to make sure he had a length of sentences on the financial crimes that would prevent him from ever leaving jail should he somehow get out of the life sentences through a successful appeal?
Over the last six months, I kept hearing he was going to get another life sentence for the financial crimes.
Just ask’n.
27 years is a life sentence because it takes him to age 81, but I see your point.
Plea deals always involve give and take. For example:
Prosecution:
"You give us something and spare us a trial and we will give you something in return."
Defense:
"Our defendant will change his plea from not guilty to guilty." "Now what is your offer to us?"
Prosecution:
"27 years instead of another life sentence."
Defense:
"Ok, we won't go to trial, please send us the papers for our defendant to sign stating your deal."
You see Alex had no incentive to change his plea to guilty without getting something in return. It always works this way. Another thing, Alex gives up his right to appeal by pleading guilty. That gives finality to the case.
![]()
plea bargain
www.law.cornell.edu
Plea bargains are agreements between defendants and prosecutors in which defendants agree to plead guilty to some or all of the charges against them in exchange for concessions from the prosecutors.
@Cool Cats, thanks for all this. This makes me uncomfortable since it seems like too a huge concession (especially because if life terms got overturned, he only has to serve 85% of 27), but I trust the AG’s office to know what they are doing.