Chelly
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 18,802
- Reaction score
- 66,889
not even the people who supposedly saw NR passed out at the party????Per courttv .. The defense will not call any witnesses.
Wow
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
not even the people who supposedly saw NR passed out at the party????Per courttv .. The defense will not call any witnesses.
Wow
By doing that, the defense gets the last word apparently. This is a complete hail mary it seems.Per courttv .. The defense will not call any witnesses.
Wow
I guess they were passed out too!not even the people who supposedly saw NR passed out at the party????
Because he wouldn’t plead guilty to murdering her.That is pretty shocking.
That means the defense has no witnesses to bolster the claim that NR fell asleep at a party and car may have been taken. The defense supposedly had expert witnesses go over the forensic evidence and apparently they have nothing to say.
Why did we have a trial ?
Evidently the defense couldn’t come up with anyone to lie under oath on NR’s behalf.
Doesn't surprise me that they're not calling any. How could they really refute the state's evidence. In closing the Defense will say someone else was driving the Impala, hoping beyond hope, one juror might hold out.Per law and crime
Defense has no witnesses closing arguments are starting soon
Because this perp is a selfish, sociopath who doesn't care about anyone but himself. I think he enjoyed the attention of a trial to be honest, and in their twisted minds, I believe they can influence even just one juror.That is pretty shocking.
That means the defense has no witnesses to bolster the claim that NR fell asleep at a party and car may have been taken. The defense supposedly had expert witnesses go over the forensic evidence and apparently they have nothing to say.
Why did we have a trial ?