Peter Brendt
New Member
What is the Good Samaritan Law, exactly. Judging from that first link, he was well versed in it by prep-time for the first malpractice suit. Apparently this is a law whereby a doctor's actions that would otherwise be measured in terms of harm done and negligence are suddenly excusable and exonerated due to various "good samaritan" factors? What is this?
I find the two pdfs interesting, that Flukeyou added as "evidence" for the "malpractice". In the first one, we have a plaintiff, who basically says "we have no documents, but we claim, he did everything wrong" (well, obvisouly not, the kid is alive) followed by "now we want a payday".
The second one deals with two other lawsuits and basically only asks to combine those two cases into one and deal with them in one trial instead of two separated trials.
The good samaritan law in fact is a kind of protection against cases in which persons, whose lives are rescued by doctors and who then decide, they also want an additional payday. Given that, I would like to see, whether there are any court documents in which a court finds CPH actually guilty of malpractice.