Okay, I have a few questions about LE recently admitted they have some doubts about the POI now.
Initially, LE stated they waited to place the sketch out, hinting that doing so earlier would somehow identify one or more of the persons who came forward.
I was also under the impression that more than one person identified the POI and that several witnesses helped in making the composite sketch.
So, how come a year later, LE admits that the POI may never have existed at all?
Was that a hidden message to one or more locals who did identify someone that they don't believe their story now?
If several people did come forward, is LE saying each of them either lied about the POI or was mistaken?
It just seems kind of strange to me to admit that the POI may never have existed given what they did release about him.....
Do you think LE was so naive' as to take the witnesses word for the POI without checking out the witnesses motives etc. when they came forward 3 days later?
Could it be possible the witnesses described the right truck at the murder scene, BUT deliberately 'changed' the ID/description of who was driving the truck to send LE on to a wild goose chase??
Vine reports that DD, who testified in front of the GJ, has now been released from custody.
Thanks RPS! It is good to see you!
Do you know why DD was arrested this time? Was he released on bond? Sorry, I've been out of the loop.....
Okay, I have a few questions about LE recently admitted they have some doubts about the POI now.
Initially, LE stated they waited to place the sketch out, hinting that doing so earlier would somehow identify one or more of the persons who came forward. I was also under the impression that more than one person identified the POI and that several witnesses helped in making the composite sketch.
So, how come a year later, LE admits that the POI may never have existed at all? Was that a hidden message to one or more locals who did identify someone that they don't believe their story now? If several people did come forward, is LE saying each of them either lied about the POI or was mistaken?
It just seems kind of strange to me to admit that the POI may never have existed given what they did release about him.
Okay, I have a few questions about LE recently admitted they have some doubts about the POI now.
Initially, LE stated they waited to place the sketch out, hinting that doing so earlier would somehow identify one or more of the persons who came forward. I was also under the impression that more than one person identified the POI and that several witnesses helped in making the composite sketch.
So, how come a year later, LE admits that the POI may never have existed at all? Was that a hidden message to one or more locals who did identify someone that they don't believe their story now? If several people did come forward, is LE saying each of them either lied about the POI or was mistaken?
It just seems kind of strange to me to admit that the POI may never have existed given what they did release about him.
Wouldn't law enforcement have obtained a warrant to secure DNA samples from these guys, that were arrested, to compare with the DNA at the crime scene? Since they have been incarcerated before wouldn't their DNA be in the CODIS database? Is DD's release indicative of no match with the DNA in Taylor's and Skyla's case?
I hope justice will prevail for these two precious girls but so much time has passed and still so many unanswered questions.
Harmony,
I have wondered about the DNA test results. I would like to know what type of DNA was found at the crime scene. (blood, saliva, epithelial cells, hair etc....) I do think that LE obtained samples from DD and many others. I am inclinded to think that 1) the DNA that was found at the scene was inconclusive because it could easily be explained away as to why it was there. For example, if they have a DNA match w/ DD, it has been rumored he was / is a friend of the famliy. If he was a friend of the family, it could be easily explained as to why "touch DNA" might be found on one of the girls. If he had been a guest in their home, it would be possible for his epethelial cells to be present etc... 2) The DNA that was found at the scene does not match any that OSBI has tested nor is it in CODIS. If this is the case, it leads me to believe the shooter(s) would be young and possibly first time offenders.
I am so disappointed that there has not been any more "movement" with this case. I really thought that with today's scientific technology this case would be easily solved. However, I am now beginning to believe it may very well become a cold case that will never be solved.
As RoseRed questioned; it there a connection between the Gaffney, SC case and this one. I saw a picture on ABC World News Tonight of the Gaffney, SC suspect. He had a cap on like the one the POI has on in this case.