EvilSoup
Former Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 603
- Reaction score
- 0
And yet not a single word about the grief and sorrow of LH or Cooper's grandparents
Gah! Hello? It's ALL ABOUT ROSS!
Some people never get it.......:doorhide:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And yet not a single word about the grief and sorrow of LH or Cooper's grandparents
Why would LE include those comments as reason for suspicion of something? If LH left Cooper in the car on purpose, why would he be blurting those things out at the police station? I think those kind of comments as coming from someone who was truly surprised to have found his son dead in the car, not someone who was trying to make it look like a mistake when it wasn't.
KILGORE: OK. What was -- what would you say was the primary piece of evidence that caused you to move from willfulness to negligence?
STODDARD: The primary was -- is how it's worded. And it was -- the medical examiner's report came back and he came back and said it was hyperthermia. Before we were going with dehydration, lack of sustenance. The child did die from the neglect of being left in that car seat. KILGORE: And that was -- that was why the decision was made to get a warrant for second degree.
[/B]Lack of sustenance? Was Cooper underweight?
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1407/03/cnr.06.html
I see how people could see it that way. I just think his concerns would be more along the lines, how am I going to face my wife, I cannot believe this has happened, how could I be so stupid? and not worrying about his job and being charged with a felony and whether there is malice or not. That is just my take on it. yours is different. Shrug. Room for all.
I wonder what Stoddard was thinking here?
KILGORE: OK. What was -- what would you say was the primary piece of evidence that caused you to move from willfulness to negligence?
STODDARD: The primary was -- is how it's worded. And it was -- the medical examiner's report came back and he came back and said it was hyperthermia. Before we were going with dehydration, lack of sustenance. The child did die from the neglect of being left in that car seat. KILGORE: And that was -- that was why the decision was made to get a warrant for second degree.
Lack of sustenance? Was Cooper underweight?
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1407/03/cnr.06.html
Yes, 30ish year old's penis, ugh.
But would it be any consolation if a 30 y/o man had sent pix of a 16 year old's equipment? Or a 60 y/o man's equipment?
Did the Det. testify that Ross' pix was actually his own?
Re poss federal criminal charges against Ross re *advertiser censored* transmission, does it matter?
Imo, the creep factor is that a 30 y/o sent the pix to a 16 y/o (someone he thought was 16), no matter whose pee-pee was pictured.
(Sorry if O/T here in the small diff thread)
LOL, even if RH said those things, do you think Stoddard would have brought them out at the hearing?
If RH did say any if those things, his attorney would have elicited them from Stoddard during cross.
sus·te·nance
The maintaining of something or someone in life or existence
Food and drink regarded as a source of strength, nourishment
He was talking to her when he said that. I do think he would have asked her if she was going to leave him... IMOYes that's right. He never said 'I'll lose my wife.' But he'll lose his job. Interesting.
LOL, even if RH said those things, do you think Stoddard would have brought them out at the hearing?
KILGORE: And at this point in time, when you spoke to him in that interview room, he had not had an opportunity to see his wife, speak to his wife, or have any interaction with her at all, had he?
STODDARD: That is correct.
KILGORE: During the interview, was he expressing to you concerns about what in the world he was going to say to his wife?*
STODDARD: Yes.
KILGORE: And he wanted to talk to her.
STODDARD: Correct.
KILGORE: And that would not be a remarkable or unusual concern for somebody in this situation, would it?
STODDARD: I would say no.
KILGORE: How long was the interview?
STODDARD: I believe the interview was about -- I'm going to say approximately, but around an hour, hour and a half.
KILGORE: And it's audio and video.
STODDARD: It is audio and video.
KILGORE: OK. So you went through the events of the day.
STODDARD: That is correct. ...
Why would Stoddard bring statements like that out in a probable cause hearing where the prosecution was assigned the job of showing...probable cause? The burden to bring such statements out was on the defense attorney, not the prosecutor. Kilgore had an opportunity to do just that; he even broached the subject with Stoddard but chose to go no further:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1407/03/cnr.06.html
I see how people could see it that way. I just think his concerns would be more along the lines, how am I going to face my wife, I cannot believe this has happened, how could I be so stupid? and not worrying about his job and being charged with a felony and whether there is malice or not. That is just my take on it. yours is different. Shrug. Room for all.
It was still hot at 5:00 pmThank you for that gngr~snap! I'll go back and add that to the edit in my post. :loveyou:
So, it looks like Stoddard arrived after Cooper was removed from the scene. I suppose the sun could have still been hot at 5 pm, but I maintain that the author of that article stretched the facts in order to make an emotional appeal. So much for Stoddard "processing" the "death car" in the manner described by the author. :facepalm:
He was talking to her when he said that. I do think he would have asked her if she was going to leave him... IMO
He knew there was a good chance the marriage eas already over.
He did say "what are we gonna do" The police will charge me with a felony, I'll lose my job...
good point! They were grilling him about Cooper's "development" &if he was growing normal.I wonder what Stoddard was thinking here?
KILGORE: OK. What was -- what would you say was the primary piece of evidence that caused you to move from willfulness to negligence?
STODDARD: The primary was -- is how it's worded. And it was -- the medical examiner's report came back and he came back and said it was hyperthermia. Before we were going with dehydration, lack of sustenance. The child did die from the neglect of being left in that car seat. KILGORE: And that was -- that was why the decision was made to get a warrant for second degree.
Lack of sustenance? Was Cooper underweight?
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1407/03/cnr.06.html
JMO I think their working theory was Cooper died from dehydration possibly. Children, babies dehydrate much quicker than adults.I wonder what Stoddard was thinking here?
KILGORE: OK. What was -- what would you say was the primary piece of evidence that caused you to move from willfulness to negligence?
STODDARD: The primary was -- is how it's worded. And it was -- the medical examiner's report came back and he came back and said it was hyperthermia. Before we were going with dehydration, lack of sustenance. The child did die from the neglect of being left in that car seat. KILGORE: And that was -- that was why the decision was made to get a warrant for second degree.
Lack of sustenance? Was Cooper underweight?
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1407/03/cnr.06.html
good point! They were grilling him about Cooper's "development" &if he was growing normal.
LH could have been a real food freak ya know.
All organic no processed food, no white flour or sugar...
Maybe he was too thin.
All posts are MOO