Bet this is one the reasons for the 'don't wipe' letter to CPD.
Wow. And wow.
Bet this is one the reasons for the 'don't wipe' letter to CPD.
Witness testified previously he had no contact w/NC after 5/8/08 meeting, and was then confronted with these cell records,
5/16 2:50PM call from NC to JP 1 min
5/16 3:00PM call from JP to NC 3 min
6/1 5:32PM call to JP from NC 8 min
6/2 9:42 call from JP to NC 1 min
6/2 9:44 call from JP to NC 5 min
6/12 11:52 call to JP from NC
now going over home phone records
Witness testified previously he had no contact w/NC after 5/8/08 meeting, and was then confronted with these cell records,
5/16 2:50PM call from NC to JP 1 min
5/16 3:00PM call from JP to NC 3 min
6/1 5:32PM call to JP from NC 8 min
6/2 9:42 call from JP to NC 1 min
6/2 9:44 call from JP to NC 5 min
6/12 11:52 call to JP from NC
now going over home phone records
these calls are in 2007
these calls are in 2007
No, they are 2008.
these calls are in 2007
obfuscation at this point. will not engage
Seems pretty straight forward to me but and it looks bad for the state.
My memory is not what it used to be but hasn't it been said the JP was the first person the NC called after she got the results of her STD test from her gyno??????
My memory is not what it used to be but hasn't it been said the JP was the first person the NC called after she got the results of her STD test from her gyno??????
VM and call and no anwer or no leave a message appear as 1 min. At least they used to, don't know about now.
JMHO
fran