Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The defense will most likely call HM as a witness, IMO. Probably JP's ex-wife as well.
I just want to say this. JP was with HM. HM was with BC. JP has lied and said he has had no contact with NC since the cofee shop talk. Also, Kurtz would not taken this case if he that BC did it. He already had been appointted cancel from the state, Trenkle. IMO there will be more bombshells before this trial is over. This Judge is horrific and I hope I would never ever have to go in front of him. He is totally pro prosecution and then we have the "good ole boy network in play too" I really dont think BC did this even if he did there is absolutely no evidence to say he did it is just "gut" feeling. I would hate to know that he would sit in prison for the rest of my life for "gut" feelings.
isn't the statute of limitations two years for that cause of action? Otherwise, i'd think so.
MOO, I don't think the Rentz' have a shadow of a doubt as to who killed their daughter. And they are privvy to far more inside information than we are IMO.
LOLOLOL! I wanted to ask but didn't. Lead me too please.
I'm only throwing out a guess here but I'm wondering if her purpose for being in court today is because they expect the defense to make an issue of the paternity of the youngest child.
I think there is more to the story of himself and NC and the content of those calls in 2008 that he's not divulging. I don't know if he necessarily lying, but it doesn't seem like he's divulging everything. It's just a gut instinct, I could be wrong.
Did he mention what the nature of his relationship with NC was in 2007? He certainly was talking with her for long lengths of time.
Isn't the statute of limitations two years for that cause of action? Otherwise, I'd think so.
Found it funny that JP was worried about his indiscretion being portrayed in the media and what it would do to his kids and ex-wife. Maybe he should of that before he got naked on a couch. But, then again - he can't remember if they engaged in sexual intercourse, right???? This guy irritates me
But it suggests that there is more to the story than JP is letting on.
Since he was with HM at the time, I wonder if NC re-started something with JP as a way to get back at HM.
What's going on with the jury? It's raining so hard here I can barely hear what the judge is saying.