"yeah, I was really interested in the ribs". Sounds like every man I know, at our cookouts, they all hover over the ribs and offer their on critiques on the best way to cook them.
Well, ribs are good over a grill. :great:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"yeah, I was really interested in the ribs". Sounds like every man I know, at our cookouts, they all hover over the ribs and offer their on critiques on the best way to cook them.
This thing with the juror worrying about getting fired continues to add to the weirdness of this trial. Is this a frequent issue with long running trials and jurors. Like I asked before, I thought there was some sort of law against that.
No. But again, we have no evidence that the CPD even went to Cisco to see if it was accounted for. Shouldn't that have been part of the prosecutions case since they are alleging he used one to spoof a call but didn't find one at the house?
A friend of the Coopers. Her husband had plans to play tennis that morning with Brad. They had plans as a couple to play games with the Coopers that night (the 12th).
I guess that we have evidence that he returned this gear to Cisco? I must have missed this in the deposition or any testimony.
oooh, things are getting a little snippy again.
Can't be found? There is absolutely no evidence that they even looked for that router. One wasn't found in his house...but the prosecution did not bring in someone from Cisco to say the router purchased in January wasn't at Cisco either. So "can't be found now" is a bit misleading, don't you think?
it has been established in testimony that cisco does not keep such records of equipment
To connect directly to the router to place a call he would need to be in close proximity to the router so not on his way to HT.
To initiate the call remotely he would have had to have some sort of network connection to the router so there would be a data trail on the cell provider network, as well as the TWC data network.
The other option would be if he was in close enough proximity to the house to use his own wireless network to connect then deleted the trail there.
I am realy surpised at the couple plans, her not calling her attorney AS, etc., if the marriage was going to end the next day as so many want us to believe.
Really??? Care to explain how you configure a router without a computer?? The router is not an intelligent device, it has no monitor or keyboard. In order for you to initiate call manager to do anything via the router, a computer/server must issue the commands.
Those commands have not been found on any computer. Where is the computer/server????
I guess everyone believes that Cisco has a way to track the 1000's upon 1000's of routers, the 10,000's upon 10,000's router interfaces that exist throughout the Cisco labs. Surely there must be a daily/weekly/monthly/yearly scan of inventory that ensures all this gear is still present and accounted for. Is this the hope that people have who claim that since Cisco has not reported certain pieces of gear missing then therefore all gear is accounted for?
Okay, you are the only one I have heard this from - that there should be no trace whatsoever of this call except for from the router. Others will have to back up what you are suggesting because it doesn't make sense to me.
it has been established in testimony that cisco does not keep such records of equipment