Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cammy, do you have your rebuttal prepared yet, or did I miss it.
thanks!Sorry.
At Wral each day when they print a story on the case, they open it up for comments.
All I can say is sit back and be prepared for anything !!
thanks!
but what does GOLO stand for???:waitasec: (I am easily confused at this time of the day as it is rush hour at my house lol)
Perhaps he didn't expect it to get so messy; he miscalculated. My personal opinion is that he planned a "soft kill", and it got out of hand, then he went into what LE calls the full tilt boogie and left his shoe print, then calmed himself and began a clean-up of CY and tried to cover his tracks within the time he had, because he had to get back to the hotel for his alibi, so the print escaped notice.But not smart enough to wear different shoes at the house IF he killed his wife.... I would never kill anyone or try to plan a murder, but if I did different shoes that I would never wear would be one of the first things I planned..
Good question.
Goofy Observations Leaving Orbit, I think.......just kidding.
No idea, anyone know?
Catching up on testimony and have been watching the cross of PY and as much as I feel bad for admitting this, I am kind of enjoying it. I feel bad for the families of everyone involved, BUT I think PY is protecting and possibly hiding information and after all these years of watching this case and the painful cross from the last trial of both her and JY, and her participation in keeping MF and LF from CF, this feels like it is ABOUT TIME for her to have to answer tough questions!! She's not so sweet when she is being called out is she??
Re: Ms. Beaver's testimony. I did not watch the first trial. I don't really care what she said the first time around. I only care about what she said during this trial.
To me, she came off as rigidly fixated in "her story". She was bordering on anger and was clearly exasperated at having any aspect of her story questioned.
Also, the "getting mad" and "getting insulted" when being questioned by detectives working a MURDER investigation of one of her NEIGHBORS seems a bit disingenious to me. Their JOB is to question your memory, to ask the same question again and again. To ask for the same information a different way. To me, the reaction she described herself as having told me more about her than it did about the investigators.
Okay, so this is her story and she's sticking to it. She was going 20 miles an hour down this road on a very dark night. She has her high beams on and a car is sitting backed into a driveway - which puts the car at a 90 degree angle or thereabouts to her car, right? And that car also has its headlights on. Oh, and there were lights on in the house. And were there any lights on those driveway pillars?
I do NOT believe this witness could have seen into that car clearly enough or for long enough at that speed and with those light conditions to be observing "hair moving" or a ring on a finger. (Which, granted she said at this time she is unsure about the ring. But apparently at one point in the past she mentioned it to detectives as a bright, shiny wedding ring.) And "light from the dashboard inside the car"?
I also do not think this witness is deliberately providing false testimony. I think she has "bought into" her own story. And will tell it this way from now until next never.
I know. It's strange. But I've known people like this. Sat and listened to them tell a story that they truly believe, when I was there for the event and KNOW it didn't happen that way. Go figure!
I have no earthly idea (anyone else know)??? (might I say tho that I truly love your cow tongue avatar!)
Catching up on testimony and have been watching the cross of PY and as much as I feel bad for admitting this, I am kind of enjoying it. I feel bad for the families of everyone involved, BUT I think PY is protecting and possibly hiding information and after all these years of watching this case and the painful cross from the last trial of both her and JY, and her participation in keeping MF and LF from CF, this feels like it is ABOUT TIME for her to have to answer tough questions!! She's not so sweet when she is being called out is she??
I hope this is okay to ask.
Is there anyone here who thought Brad Cooper was NG but thinks Jason Young is G?
Or, vice versa?
He needs to be put to pasture. However, today has been his finest day ever that I've seen in both this trial and the BC trial. He was absolutely brilliant today by comparison.
I hope this is okay to ask.
Is there anyone here who thought Brad Cooper was NG but thinks Jason Young is G?
Or, vice versa?
Having been a frequent traveler, It just becomes a habit to grab that keycard when leaving the room. "Keycard? Check." It only took a time or two of getting locked out to learn that habit.
And if I was a man with pockets? Why on earth wouldn't I just grab the keycard?
This is just silly.
I thought Cooper was NG, but the jury thought otherwise, and I'm fine with their decision. However, a poor defense and a judge way too sympathetic to the PT had a big influence on that verdict. Also the PT was way better, and more effective than the DT in the Cooper case.
I think JY is guilty, but I think the PT has/was insipid and left Reasonable Doubt in play. JY's defense has been good, as a whole. But that does not mean he is innocent, rather the case has been handled poorly by the state.
It took 5 years to bring JY to trial the first time, and that's because the case is weak, and is still weak. Hell, they waited nearly 4 years just to arrest JY, Cooper was behind bars waiting for trial in less than 4 months after NC's murder.
That's a clue right there how the state is grasping and reaching in getting a firm conviction on JY's butt....IMHO