katydid23
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 67,498
- Reaction score
- 234,651
So - if HHJBP was in fact the prosecutor on VT's case, is that considered a conflict of interest legally/ethically??? Is that what the DT is trying to accomplish here - getting yet another judge to recuse himself? Hopefully one of our lawyer posters can clarify. AGH - this case is making me nuts. That's why I don't post on the ICA forum much.. I appreciate all of you who do post, but even just reading about this circus sometimes makes me wanna :banghead: moo
Nah, don't worry. It will be a non-issue because the guy had no connection to this case. I suppose if one of the key witnesses had been prosecuted by Judge P, then there might be some things to work through.
But this is the reddest herring of all. And there have been a dozen red herrings at least. IMO, this is just going to be one of the things that add to the judge's anger tomorrow morning.