sorrell skye
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 6,684
- Reaction score
- 7,007
Maybe, but I honestly don't think something deeper is necessary. I teach this age group - heck, I taught one of these kids, apparently, though I have no recollection of him. And although the scale of this is clearly different, the impulsive blind allegiance to a friend without much thought for the bigger picture, for others, for your own future, etc. - is characteristic of the age.
Did they have shared ideology? Maybe. In a vague, not very well defined way fueled by a romantic, cool image of what that ideology might look like. Just like you could ask why they had "terrorista" custom license plates when they had an expired visa and were chatting about bombs over lunch. IMO, they were taken with the image of themselves as cool, counter-culture rebels in a sea of Americans - much moreso than sharing an actual deep feeling of radical religious fervor. JMO.
When I think of "impulsive blind allegiance to a friend without much thought for the bigger picture" in the context of terrorist bombings that resulted in deaths & maiming, I can't help but wonder to what cause this possible "blind allegiance" may have been given.
When the pics of the "terrorista #1" license plate were posted awhile ago, I paid little attention. I filed it away for future reference.
Now, I'm beginning to wonder how the owner of that car may perceive himself. I don't find anything "romantic" or "cool" about trying to project an image of oneself as a terrorist, even if that portrayal was possibly made in jest. I find it repulsive. Terrorism is NOT romantic or cool.
History is filled with examples of counterculture rebels of various ideologies who effected peaceful change without committing acts of terrorism that caused death & injury to innocent people.
ETA: The fact that these 3 allegedly conspired to dispose of material evidence directly related to terrorist bombings suggests to me that they may possibly believe that violence is a means to an end (whatever that end may be), and suggests to me that they were/are supportive of DT's & TT's heinous actions.