Scout
Well-Known Member
All this makes a great deal of sense
Would they be bold enough to park in her driveway?
Possibly
They were stupid enough to shop at Walmart.
All this makes a great deal of sense
Would they be bold enough to park in her driveway?
Possibly
I'm fairly new to this case and don't know if this has been discussed - I'm very curious about the security system. How did they get in without setting off the alarms? Wouldn't they be worried about setting them off - unless they knew how to disable them?
A Family member, Duntulum(unverified) posted that the alarm was off prior to TS arriving home. Possibly as early as Saturday.
He said, without going into detail , that the fact it was off was irrelevant to the case
He stated that the two arrested did not turn it off
But how would they know it was off? How would they know that if they jimmied open a door, a blaring alarm might not go off or a security/police officer arrive on the scene within minutes?
A Family member, Duntulum(unverified) posted that the alarm was off prior to TS arriving home. Possibly as early as Saturday.
He said, without going into detail , that the fact it was off was irrelevant to the case
A Family member, Duntulum(unverified) posted that the alarm was off prior to TS arriving home. Possibly as early as Saturday.
I notice that information has also been published in the media, where MS allegedly says it may have been his mother who accidently left it off. http://www.nbc-2.com/story/30013123/sievers-family-friend-sheds-new-light-on-homes-security-system#.VfxPx_ldV8E
But you don't travel from Missouri to Florida to break into a home on the off chance someone will have forgotten to turn on the alarm.
This insistence by MS and his friends that it's 'irrelevant' is very suspicious, of course it's relevant.
And why didn't TS turn it back on? She's staying alone in the house, I imagine she'd set the alarm when she got in. Why have all that security if you feel so safe in the home that you don't bother using it?
I didn't know that. Thanks. However...A Family member, Duntulum(unverified) posted that the alarm was off prior to TS arriving home. Possibly as early as Saturday.
He said, without going into detail , that the fact it was off was irrelevant to the case
He stated that the two arrested did not turn it off
I didn't know that. Thanks. However...
Knowing the Sievers family was out of town, wouldn't Wright and Rodgers naturally assume the security system was "on" and therefore still cut its wires to disable it?
For Wright and Rodgers to break into a house without first disabling the home's security system reeks of having inside information. Then again, Wright and Rodgers still may have had that inside information (wink, wink) but cut the wires in an effort to make it look like they didn't have that inside information.
Something fishy going on.
I notice that information has also been published in the media, where MS allegedly says it may have been his mother who accidently left it off. http://www.nbc-2.com/story/30013123...w-light-on-homes-security-system#.VfxPx_ldV8E
But you don't travel from Missouri to Florida to break into a home on the off chance someone will have forgotten to turn on the alarm.
This insistence by MS and his friends that it's 'irrelevant' is very suspicious, of course it's relevant.
Obviously, the alarm being off IS relevant to the case. The point that had been made was that the reason that the alarm was off, as far as we knew, was not a result of anything done by the two suspects. (It truly may have been accidentally off.) In other words, since we had been privy to some information regarding the alarm and we knew that neither of the suspects tripped/cut/remotely shut off the alarm, whatever, the speculation about the suspects' involvement in the alarm being off could be irrelevant.
Some feel she was attacked as she entered the house
This is all speculation of course
So they were lying in wait for hours for her to come home - unless CWW had access to her plane ticket and knew when she'd arrive? Or quizzed his friend MS about it in casual conversation..."O so Theresa's going home earlier than you, is she? When exactly does her flight arrive?"
I didn't know that. Thanks. However...
Knowing the Sievers family was out of town, wouldn't Wright and Rodgers naturally assume the security system was "on" and therefore still cut its wires to disable it?
For Wright and Rodgers to break into a house without first disabling the home's security system reeks of having inside information. Then again, Wright and Rodgers still may have had that inside information (wink, wink) but cut the wires in an effort to make it look like they didn't have that inside information.
Something fishy going on.
That is an excellent question, Wing Ding!. Fishy is right. That brings me to another thought. With technology today, can't some alarm systems be turned off electronically via a smart phone or pc? Wouldn't it be telling if we learn the alarm was turned off that way? SMS seemed to hint that digital footprints were especially important in this case. My speculation only, of course.
Thank you very much for offering some clarity here for us. My best thoughts go out to you and your family, Duntulum.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The statement that Mark allegedly made to Todd Lifka that he was concerned his mother may have failed to arm the security system or inadvertently disarmed it is potentially incriminating. It indicates his knowledge that Teresa had no opportunity to arm the system herself, suggesting that she was indeed ambushed by an assailant or assailants already inside.
How would he have that knowledge? There are two possibilities: a leak from the investigation or personal involvement. IMO, the sheriff and his personnel have displayed professionalism, making a leak less likely. This is a detail that has significant evidentiary value and should be kept secret because, outside of investigators, the only persons who would know it are the killers.