re: "One of the safes
was said to have 40,000 in U.S. Currency."
(source below)
i can't find anything verifying there was $40,000 in a safe at the Sievers' house.
i am wondering if part of the original plan was to say there was, and then file a claim for that on their homeowner's policy, since his house was made to look like it was broken into, and staged to look like a robbery
i looked it up via a quick google search, and though it isn't typically covered, it seems like you can buy a policy or a rider specifically for large sums of cash, similar to if you had coins or other valuable collectables.
jmo + too much time on my hands
-----------------------------------
FL - *Mark Sievers Verified Friend* FL - Dr Teresa Sievers, 46
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...erified-Friend*-FL-Dr-Teresa-Sievers-46/page8
Post#106
Aug30
>Originally Posted by atthelake
I would assume you would know if anything was missing from your conversations with Mark?
>Skinner
Verified Insider - Sievers
They would not let him into the house for several days or maybe a week or three. I remember on our 2nd conversation I asked him about if anything was stolen, and he said he did not know. I said, "What do you mean? What about your safes?" He said, "Oh, yeah, they were okay. The LE made me open them."
------------------------------------------
page#6
Statement #1 of Mark Sievers:
As M. Sievers explained the contents of the four safes located within his dwelling and the numerous firearms and other associated values, it was evident that nothing was taken from the scene.
One of the safes was said to have 40,000 in U.S. Currency.
----------------------------
page#12
Establishment of Timeline/Motive:
Nothing has been noted as being removed or stolen from the residence throughout the investigation...
-------------------------------
Bates#3068
Sept15
Sworn affadavit of Detective Jamie Nolen
Detective Nolen learned that the Lee County Sheriffs Office Crime Scene Unit had completed their processing of the scene and wished for Detective Nolen to learn which property may be missing.
Detective Nolen requested Mark Sievers meet for a third interview so that he may ascertain if any property was stolen.
Mark Sievers did not show up for the meeting. Detective Nolen called Sievers and left a voicemail.
Lee Hollander called Detective Nolen by cellular phone and advised that his client, Mark Sievers, would no longer be co-operating with Law Enforcement.
-------------------------------------