Anti-K
All your counterfactual speculation is based on a fallacious premise, i.e. that the foreign dna is that of JonBenet's killer, whereas the the actual forensic evidence suggests its more likely to be mere touch-dna, why?
Because it does not appear on any other artifact in the wine-cellar never mind the house!
.
All your counterfactual speculation is based on a fallacious premise, i.e. that the foreign dna is that of JonBenet's killer, whereas the the actual forensic evidence suggests its more likely to be mere touch-dna, why?
Because it does not appear on any other artifact in the wine-cellar never mind the house!
.