minor4th
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 8,152
- Reaction score
- 2,110
Thanks for the well thought out response to my post Zoobiegirl! I did get a chuckle lol. My Gran had a guy calling her not stop asking if she wore black pantyhose, where do these weirdos come from? LOL
I agree with a few things you mentioned, such as the proximity of the car seat, I think where we differ most is that I see no signs of RH being a sociopath.
I haven't heard a single person give any indication that he was or that he resented his child or was strange. Not even the women he was sexting. In any case I have followed with a sociopath, there are always at least
a few people who came forward to mention the creepy vibe they got from the person (even Scott Peterson, though some are saying everyone thought he was normal, that is NOT true). A sociopath does walk around emulating human emotion and empathy the best they can, but I have never seen
a case where that "mask" never slipped even once ever before a murder. I also have not seen the state try to bring that angle up. If they could find testimony/prove he was a sociopath beyond one joking comment about not having a conscience, I am sure they would, it would certainly make the case better than what they did show. But no, everyone in this guys life said he loved his boy and had good things to say about him for the most part.
Since I just don't see evidence of RH being a sociopath, I do not think he simply left the baby in the car on purpose, went to shoot the breeze with work buds while the kid was baking while acting completely normal,
going out at lunch to check if the baby was dead, hear or see some sign he wasn't, then just go back to work, again completely normal until setting the scene after 4pm when the deed was done.
I especially do not see him doing all that because of a double life. I think he got his kicks FROM that double life and sex with strangers. He wasn't looking for love affairs, I think he liked playing naughty old perverted church guy. Pretty well said as much.
In every hot car death case I read up on, there are instances and facts that make me think WTF??? How??? Every single one of them. But I do not believe all of those deaths were done on purpose, I am just not sure what I have
been shown that can tell me this one was, even the close car seat. Some of these parents forget in what seemed to be seconds, some left more than one child, some had triggers but still didn't remember until getting all the way back to daycare, some drove around not smelling a thing, some had small vehicles. I just could not rule RH guilty when the only thing that is different in his case is that I know he's a gross perv.
I also will not find someone guilty for not crying enough, or for laughing when I don't think they should, or because I have a gut feeling, or because his wife is weird. I just wanted to see facts that he at least was truly fed up with his kid beyond the "joker" comment. I have called my son things in jest that could definitely be taken out of context, once it was "soul sucker" because he kept waking up at 4am lol! I have also definitely complained about things like his school constantly asking for money.
It really does not help me seeing all of the internet searches etc. taken out of context. I'm actually pretty disturbed by this investigation. I know Ross is far from a sympathetic creature, but if LE is free to do what they did to him, they're free to do that to anyone. And no, it is not more disturbing than what happened to Cooper or the sexting with minors and I hope he is punished appropriately, just not with malice.
Very well said. I agree with everything.
Especially important - we, as a collective, should never allow police and the state put people in prison for life on evidence that falls short of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
While we may have no sympathy for Ross Harris, next time it could be your neighbor or your brother or your son who gets targeted by overzealous white-hats.