Sustained
Justice for Stacy
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2008
- Messages
- 2,769
- Reaction score
- 7,080
Originally Posted by Sustained View Post
There is no evidence to show that FCA DID NOT make chloroform either. Since chloroform is made from bleach, ice, & acetone and all of those could have been present in the Anthony home. OCSO would have had to find a bottle of homemade chloroform to prove it. And IMO, FCA had plenty of time to ditch any homemade chloroform ... what would you do if you had killed your kid with chloroform ? Hand the bottle over to police ?
For one thing, I don't know of any household that has acetone just laying around. I believe that she would have had to have purchased it to make chloroform. Being broke as she was, I just don't see it. But still if she did purchase acetone, and make chloroform, nobody proved it or even tried to prove it.
Acetone is used as a paint thinner and solvent and I happen to have some in my garage. and it's not a stretch to think GA could have had some in his garage or shed as well, given he was pretty handy around the house. And FCA broke ? Gimme break ... all she had to do was reach into CA's purse for a little cash.
Obviously, you and I were not watching the same trial. You choose to ignore all of the "consciousness of guilt" evidence as well as the detailed forensics around the body and the car. You choose to ignore the jailhouse interviews, the tattoo, lying to police, the borrowing of the shovel, etc etc etc. None of those "dots" in and of itself proves that FCA killed Caylee and disposed of the body. But for those who choose to work the puzzle, it's actually quite simple to make the connection.
I watched the same trial. Lying, Tatoo's, partying: are not evidence or proof, that she murdered Caylee. There wasn't anything surrounding the shovel that proved anything. Nothing ties KC to disposing the body.
Nothing x/c for the Henkel duct tape, the laundry bag, Caylee's clothes, and the fact FCA was the only one to drive the Sunfire between 6/16 & 6/27.
Do me a favor ... go look up "consciousness of guilt" and you will see that "consciousness of guilt" IS CONSIDERED EVIDENCE in a court of law. Lying to police, a Bella Vita tattoo, partying for 31 days are evidence of "consciousness of guilt" IF YOUR DAUGHTER IS ALREADY DEAD
And most of us verdict supporters know how the court systems works ... sometimes innocent people go to jail and guilty ones walk. And sometimes a jury just doesn't get it, doesn't understand the jury instructions, and makes a mistake. In this case, it was a huge mistake ...
Always my opinion ...
Comments in red ...
In a criminal prosecution, consciousness of guilt is not its own form of evidence, but is a type of circumstantial evidence, which comprises its probative value on the theory that, whether deliberately or accidentally discovered, the conduct of the accused (usually after the crime) provides a rich vein of inculpatory data that can be a factual base upon which to infer the guilty mind of the accused.